You are very welcome.I thank you for your service .
Is that why you're so friend'ed up in the head?I am a veteran.
Are you a veteran, or an armchair quarterback?
Prove it.
You're the liberal.Is that why you're so friend'ed up in the head?
I'll take that as a yes, it is why you're so friend'ed up in the head.You're the liberal.
Isn't there a Trump protest you should be throwing rocks at?
How so?You're the liberal, sad thing is you don't even know it.
I explained it pretty clearly:How so?
You're the liberal, sad thing is you don't even know it.
A non-interventionist foreign policy is the true conservative position.
You prove yourself to be a neoconservative with every post.
This thread is entitled "President Obama".....not President Reagan. TTKUHow many rooms were in Ron and Nancy's ranch house? Any space for the Secret Service?
You added that after I responded to you.I explained it pretty clearly:
They had that before he became president.How many rooms were in Ron and Nancy's ranch house? Any space for the Secret Service?
You don't like other people's decisions.I think people can decide perfectly fine for themselves.
The problem is the people who don't like other people's decision.
DIDO, have you figured out a better way to beat Japan without dropping 2 atomic bombs on them?Because can Monday morning quarterback with the best of them, but I have yet to hear a better option from you.
We could have dropped one bomb 5 miles off their coastline as a display, and then dropped leaflets all over Japan saying that we had ten more ready to go, you have three days to surrender.
In either case, the second bomb was unnecessary.
Here you go:DIDO, have you figured out a better way to beat Japan without dropping 2 atomic bombs on them?
It's been a couple of days, and I don't see any reply.
So how do you get Japan to surrender without dropping atomic bombs on their cities?
These are opinions, not fact.Here you go:
"Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and second because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face.' "
-Dwight D. Eisenhower
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan."
-Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet
"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender."
-Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman
"The War would have been over in two weeks without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the War at all." Except that it drastically speeded the War's end to deprive the Russians of territory in east Asia.
-Major General Curtis LeMay
OK, we drop an atomic bomb 5 miles off the coast of Japan.We could have dropped one bomb 5 miles off their coastline as a display, and then dropped leaflets all over Japan saying that we had ten more ready to go, you have three days to surrender.
In either case, the second bomb was unnecessary.