President Trump

[MAKAVELI]

All the more reason the Governor of California should be held accountable ... Moonbean is leaving office in January but some of the blame lies there.
Now the question is, are the dumbbutts going to rebuild in Paradise?
I feel the same for people that build within a half-mile of the beach in the Gulf.

I don't know since most of those dumbbutts are cuckservatives.

 

[Benben]

So liberal policy is putting out fires. What’s the conservative policy solution?

Burn Baby!

"I want great a climate" Trump, 2018

 

[MAKAVELI]

All the more reason the Governor of California should be held accountable ... Moonbean is leaving office in January but some of the blame lies there.
Now the question is, are the dumbbutts going to rebuild in Paradise?
I feel the same for people that build within a half-mile of the beach in the Gulf.

Or the entire east coast.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Or the entire east coast.

I can't argue that ... They don't get hit as often or as hard but definitely the same line of thought.

 

[MAKAVELI]

I can't argue that ... They don't get hit as often or as hard but definitely the same line of thought.

Most of these fire scarred areas get hit very often either.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Most of these fire scarred areas get hit very often either.

I'm sure that was clear in your head but outside of it, the sentence structure is confusing.
Is that Ebonics?

 

[MAKAVELI]

I'm sure that was clear in your head but outside of it, the sentence structure is confusing.
Is that Ebonics?

No but I don't have to attend NA meetings to be clear.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

No but I don't have to attend NA meetings to be clear.

There you go again!
Confusing sentence.
It's "clean".

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Most of these fire scarred areas get hit very often either.

I'm sure that was clear in your head but outside of it, the sentence structure is confusing.

It still doesn't make any sense.
You have 30 minutes from the post time to correct it.
I still don't know what you mean.

 

[MAKAVELI]

It still doesn't make any sense.
You have 30 minutes from the post time to correct it.
I still don't know what you mean.

Most areas that burn don't burn very often. Probably less often then areas on the east coast that get hit by hurricanes. Understand now?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Most areas that burn don't burn very often. Probably less often then areas on the east coast that get hit by hurricanes. Understand now?

Most of these fire scarred areas get hit very often either.

So you meant this, "Most of these fire scarred areas don't get hit very often."?

 

[vantexan]

So you are saying that there was a plan in Trump’s Department of the Interior to remove fuel from the forest floors and liberals blocked it?

Really?

All that fuel on the forest floor didn't happen in just the last two years and those court rulings haven't been overturned as far as I know.

 

[vantexan]

So liberal policy is putting out fires. What’s the conservative policy solution?

What is generally recognized now is fire is part of the ecosystem. Fire should have been allowed to run it's course over the decades. Protect people's homes on the edge of national forests but otherwise let nature do what it does.

 

[vantexan]

You do realize the Camp and Woosely Fires were not in old growth Forrests don't you?

Show me the court orders concerning those areas then we can talk.

P.S. Google "fire suppression" for more info.

 

[MAKAVELI]

What is generally recognized now is fire is part of the ecosystem. Fire should have been allowed to run it's course over the decades. Protect people's homes on the edge of national forests but otherwise let nature do what it does.

That's pretty much what they do Van. There are strict rules in place on fighting fires in national Forrests. California has no say in those rules

 

[MAKAVELI]

Show me the court orders concerning those areas then we can talk.

Look on a map Van. No need for court orders.

 

[MAKAVELI]

So you meant this, "Most of these fire scarred areas don't get hit very often."?

Simon ese.

 

[It will be fine]

What is generally recognized now is fire is part of the ecosystem. Fire should have been allowed to run it's course over the decades. Protect people's homes on the edge of national forests but otherwise let nature do what it does.

I still don’t see how your argument falls along partisan lines. Was there ever a doubt that fires are a natural occurrence? Is there some type of ideological argument that makes fire management a liberal/conservative dichotomy? Or do you just reflexively blame democrats for everything?

 

[vantexan]

I still don’t see how your argument falls along partisan lines. Was there ever a doubt that fires are a natural occurrence? Is there some type of ideological argument that makes fire management a liberal/conservative dichotomy? Or do you just reflexively blame democrats for everything?

Environmentalists i.e. liberals have pursued the policy through the courts to suppress fire in forests. This leads to a lot of undergrowth that fuels these massive fires. Doesn't matter whether it's old growth or not. And I suspect even newer growth forests are wanted to be allowed to become old growth. No logging, etc.

 

[MAKAVELI]

Environmentalists i.e. liberals have pursued the policy through the courts to suppress fire in forests. This leads to a lot of undergrowth that fuels these massive fires. Doesn't matter whether it's old growth or not. And I suspect even newer growth forests are wanted to be allowed to become old growth. No logging, etc.

Wrong.