President Trump

[newfie]

again bradley smith head of the campaign fiance committee for five years. not only does he say trump did no wrong he say cohen did no wrong.


Former FEC Chairman Says Cohen and Trump Didn't Break Campaign Finance Law

on Cohen he says the following:

Michael Cohen is pleading guilty to something that isn’t a crime,” Smith wrote in National Review.

“Of course, people will do that when a zealous prosecutor is threatening them with decades in prison,”

 

[newfie]

perhaps one prominent expert is not enough ?

Trump’s Ex-Lawyer Didn’t Violate Campaign Finance Laws, and Neither Did the President

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Lol newtie is getting nervous

 

[It will be fine]

the different people you quoted from who I have listed here are campaign finance experts. do you have any?

The federal prosecutors that secured a guilty plea. They probably have a good idea what the law is.

 

[Jones]

The federal prosecutors that secured a guilty plea. They probably have a good idea what the law is.

Cohen isn't some clueless yokel who got buffaloed by the FBI, he's an actual lawyer. The idea that he somehow got snookered into pleading guilty when he hadn't committed a crime is just nonsense.

 

[newfie]

The federal prosecutors that secured a guilty plea. They probably have a good idea what the law is.

Cohen was facing decades in jail for fraud and tax evasion. he would have plead guilty to carnal knowledge with a pink elephant to get it down to three years.

the fact remains the top finance experts in the country said he did nothing wrong on campaign finance. if that was Cohens only charge he would never have been taken to court over it.

this was political theater at its worst. I hope you guys are enjoying this breach of justice because someday it will be your guy getting railed.

 

[It will be fine]

Cohen was facing decades in jail for fraud and tax evasion. he would have plead guilty to carnal knowledge with a pink elephant to get it down to three years.

the fact remains the top finance experts in the country said he did nothing wrong on campaign finance. if that was Cohens only charge he would never have been taken to court over it.

this was political theater at its worst. I hope you guys are enjoying this breach of justice because someday it will be your guy getting railed.

Okie dokie. You believe the experts that say what you want to hear, not surprising. Do they have all the information? Did they interview Cohen? Do they have the paper trail? Perhaps the prosecutors and the felon have a different understanding of what happened.

 

[newfie]

Cohen isn't some clueless yokel who got buffaloed by the FBI, he's an actual lawyer. The idea that he somehow got snookered into pleading guilty when he hadn't committed a crime is just nonsense.

who said he got snookered. the guy was caught dead to rights on fraud and income tax evasive. he was more then happy to plead guilty to some BS campaign fiance charge to get his sentence reduced. Meanwhile the prosecuters get some wonderful press in a heavily democratic district. that pays huge dividends for their political ambitions.

 

[newfie]

Okie dokie. You believe the experts that say what you want to hear, not surprising. Do they have all the information? Did they interview Cohen? Do they have the paper trail? Perhaps the prosecutors and the felon have a different understanding of what happened.

okie dokie you ignore campaign finance experts and constitutional experts to chase your CNN fairy tale.

 

[It will be fine]

okie dokie you ignore campaign finance experts and constitutional experts to chase your CNN fairy tale.

I believe it’s open to interpretation and I know I don’t have all the facts, only what’s been reported, admissions you apparently are unwilling to make.

 

[newfie]

I believe it’s open to interpretation and I know I don’t have all the facts, only what’s been reported, admissions you apparently are unwilling to make.

how is information from campaign fiance experts who have worked in the industry their whole lives and whose job it was to ensure 100 percent compliance open for interpretation? That is as silly as any argument you have made here.

 

[It will be fine]

how is information from campaign fiance experts who have worked in the industry their whole lives and whose job it was to ensure 100 percent compliance open for interpretation? That is as silly as any argument you have made here.

There is no information from your experts. There is their interpretation of the law based on publicly available information. There is also the view of prosecutors and the man that committed the crimes. You don’t have all the information they do.

 

[newfie]

There is no information from your experts. There is their interpretation of the law based on publicly available information. There is also the view of prosecutors and the man that committed the crimes. You don’t have all the information they do.

there is it was presented here and now you're dancing because it does not fit the narrative you want to believe. thank god our justice system is not based on your blind pig headed partisan logic.

 

[Jones]

 

[newfie]

View attachment 226505

Youre right it is fake news and a witch Hunt. I am surprised you're in agreement

 

[vantexan]

Not based on election malfeasance. But the House investigation on all matters Trump should prove interesting starting with those pesky tax returns.

If the IRS hasn't gone after him, and they actually have the returns, then why would the House?

 

[vantexan]

You are a great example of why the entitlement system in this country doesn't work.

Why's that? I haven't even begun to take SS yet and may be dead before or shortly after I do.

 

[It will be fine]

If the IRS hasn't gone after him, and they actually have the returns, then why would the House?

The IRS isn’t concerned about foreign financial entanglements influencing US policy. The house is.

 

[bbsam]

If the IRS hasn't gone after him, and they actually have the returns, then why would the House?

Is that a serious question?

Because the IRS has neither the time nor the resources. The House has both.

 

[vantexan]

The IRS isn’t concerned about foreign financial entanglements influencing US policy. The house is.

If he had something wrong with his tax returns you don't think the Obama IRS wouldn't have found it? You actually believe they didn't scrutinize everything in hopes of derailing his campaign? Do you believe a fat man in a reindeer drawn sleigh will bring gifts to all the good little kids of the world?