newfie
Well-Known Member
If you play the record backwards is says Trump beat Hillary's ass and the left is still pi $$ed off.
if you play it sideways it says the same thing. it may be the perfect recording.
If you play the record backwards is says Trump beat Hillary's ass and the left is still pi $$ed off.
Apparently @floridays does.
Apparently @floridays does.
If you play the record backwards is says Trump beat Hillary's ass and the left is still pi $$ed off.
Thank God for the EC.I think most of that is just resentment that Hillary won the popular vote by nearly 3,000,000 in 2016. The electoral college alone won the Presidency for both George W Bush and Trump. Not the will of the people.
Doesn’t change the fact that Hillary’s decision to not visit and campaign in a few key states might have lost the election for her.
Thank God for the EC.
You ever check out a county by county vote? It reveals the wisdom of the Founders.
Well that's just foolish, the modern electoral college is nothing like the one the founders used.Thank God for the EC.
You ever check out a county by county vote? It reveals the wisdom of the Founders.
Problem is, you’re down to trying to pull a “load” from a dead stop in 4th gear, high range.All of them. That’s politics in America because elections have consequences.
Again, have you ever looked at a county by county voting result of the Trump/ Hillary election?For sure. I don’t mind if Republicans need electoral handouts.
Again, have you ever looked at a county by county voting result of the Trump/ Hillary election?
You really are clueless, or is it just willful stupidity?Why is that relevant? Nobody’s vote should count for more than anybody else’s.
You're projecting.You really are clueless, or is it just willful stupidity?
You really are clueless, or is it just willful stupidity?
You don't see the relevancy ?Why is that relevant? Nobody’s vote should count for more than anybody else’s.
You don't see the relevancy ?
Clustered mega populated areas that are convinced to vote for a candidate would be all it would take to win every election .
Why campaign any where in the country but southern California, southern Florida, and New York?
The people making this comparison are essentially saying that the vote of someone who lives in the country should count for more than the vote of someone who lives in the city. I don't understand why they think this is a compelling argument.Your side is the one pointing at the colors on a map and saying “SEE?!!”
The numbers do not lie. There were nearly 3,000,000 more people who voted for Hillary than Trump. It doesn’t matter that Republican counties are typically far less populated and cover a greater geographical area.
Evidently you live in one of the 'dense' population centers that would control the elections, if we used the popular vote.Your side is the one pointing at the colors on a map and saying “SEE?!!”
The numbers do not lie. There were nearly 3,000,000 more people who voted for Hillary than Trump. It doesn’t matter that Republican counties are typically far less populated and cover a greater geographical area.
Because the Presidency is supposed to represent the will of the country as a whole, and not three major population centers.The people making this comparison are essentially saying that the vote of someone who lives in the country should count for more than the vote of someone who lives in the city. I don't understand why they think this is a compelling argument.
They are usually the same people who say that Trump would have won the popular vote if you don't count California, which is basically saying that Trump would have won the popular vote if you don't count all the votes of the people who didn't vote for him. Don't really get that one either.