Amazing that they put this out just before the Senate trial. Amazing.The GAO disagrees.
Amazing that they put this out just before the Senate trial. Amazing.The GAO disagrees.
Nah, they're all minding their P's and Q's now that they see real Deep State actors about to get indicted.Yes. Just another deep state conspiracy I’m sure.
Says the non-partisan Democrat, LOL.
The GAO disagrees.
Are you really trying to suggest that you are nonpartisan?Says the non-partisan Democrat, LOL.
I read their opinion and it's just plain stupid.The GAO disagrees.
Don’t care, trump bad. Get rekt kid.I read their opinion and it's just plain stupid.
Pages of beurocratic blabbering about procedural rules for Congressional appropriations explaining that Trump has to release the funds.
....and buried in one sentence on page three is this little gem:
"The appropriation made the funds available for obligation through September 30, 2019."
The funds were released September 11, 2019. No laws were broken. Nice try demwits.
And you want to say then that Trump therefore had the right to use the funding up to September 30th in order to extort a foreign government for personal gain? Are you dismissing everything else as “bureaucratic blabbering” and hanging your sorry defense on one line? Damn, son! Talk about grasping at straws!I read their opinion and it's just plain stupid.
Pages of beurocratic blabbering about procedural rules for Congressional appropriations explaining that Trump has to release the funds.
....and buried in one sentence on page three is this little gem:
"The appropriation made the funds available for obligation through September 30, 2019."
The funds were released September 11, 2019. No laws were broken. Nice try demwits.
Trump did not use the funds to extort a foreign government for personal gain. You're thinking of Joe Biden.And you want to say then that Trump therefore had the right to use the funding up to September 30th in order to extort a foreign government for personal gain? Are you dismissing everything else as “bureaucratic blabbering” and hanging your sorry defense on one line? Damn, son! Talk about grasping at straws!
I read their opinion and it's just plain stupid.
Pages of beurocratic blabbering about procedural rules for Congressional appropriations explaining that Trump has to release the funds.
....and buried in one sentence on page three is this little gem:
"The appropriation made the funds available for obligation through September 30, 2019."
The funds were released September 11, 2019. No laws were broken. Nice try demwits.
Hanging your hat on another farce again?And you want to say then that Trump therefore had the right to use the funding up to September 30th in order to extort a foreign government for personal gain? Are you dismissing everything else as “bureaucratic blabbering” and hanging your sorry defense on one line? Damn, son! Talk about grasping at straws!
The funds were released within the timetable Congress laid out. Maybe if Democrats weren't such idiots they would have waited 20 days and you would have an argument."The President has narrow, limited authority to withhold appropriations under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974," Armstrong continued in a separate press statement. "OMB told GAO that it withheld the funds to ensure that they were not spent 'in a manner that could conflict with the President’s foreign policy.' The law does not permit OMB to withhold funds for policy reasons."
The problem appears to be that when Trump’s people explain what they were doing, they implicate the administration in wrongdoing.
Yes, as a matter of fact the president did exactly that.Trump did not use the funds to extort a foreign government for personal gain. You're thinking of Joe Biden.
Grasping at straws is what democrats have been doing for the last 3 years.And you want to say then that Trump therefore had the right to use the funding up to September 30th in order to extort a foreign government for personal gain? Are you dismissing everything else as “bureaucratic blabbering” and hanging your sorry defense on one line? Damn, son! Talk about grasping at straws!
It did make me mad when Trump told the Ukrainian president that he had to fire the prosecutor investigating the company that was paying Trump's son $83k a month or lose a billion in aid. Oh, wait....The crime is in the extortion. It is irrelevant that they were eventually released. Of course you release the funds when you've been caught trying to gain from withholding them.
Laws were broken. Good try at defending your Orange Fool.
Have you forgotten what I’ve always said about impeachment? I’ll slow down for you.Hanging your hat on another farce again?
No, as a matter of fact he did not.Yes, as a matter of fact the president did exactly that.
You’d be better off trying to go with, “Well, he did it but it’s not impeachable.”
That’s the more defensible line of crap.