DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
@trickpony1Always putting things in the extreme to avoid the truth. Who said they were going to conquer the country?
@trickpony1Always putting things in the extreme to avoid the truth. Who said they were going to conquer the country?
A lot of us would settle for just being left the hell alone...That is why you'll never hear me complain about millennials as the last thing I want to do is make you rich!
A lot of us would settle for just being left the hell alone...
A viewpoint that crosses generational lines I'm sure.
Oh come on, activist judges have delayed that process. And it wasn't a freeze on immigration, it was a travel ban on a limited amount of countries. Same countries Obama administration labeled as problematic.Trump wanted a freeze on immigration to review the vetting process. That was months ago... why have we heard nothing of this review? What has he come up with? Surely after months he's come up with a bigly beautiful yugely great plan.
Activist judges delayed him reviewing the vetting process? How so?Oh come on, activist judges have delayed that process. And it wasn't a freeze on immigration, it was a travel ban on a limited amount of countries. Same countries Obama administration labeled as problematic.
By stopping the travel ban.Activist judges delayed him reviewing the vetting process? How so?
And a few of us would settle for you leaving us the hell alone, LOL.A lot of us would settle for just being left the hell alone...
A viewpoint that crosses generational lines I'm sure.
So in order to review the current system, he has to ban it from happening altogether first?By stopping the travel ban.
Well there's an answer.I figured if you can move the goalpost then I'll beat you to it.
Nice. Travel ban was to be put in place while they looked at what could be done to insure passenger safety on planes as well as how they could identify potential threats to the country. Of course being all wise and all knowing you've got it figured out without any effort. You should offer your services to the U.N.. I'm sure they're looking for a saviour. All the world's issues neatly worked out in a few hours.So in order to review the current system, he has to ban it from happening altogether first?
Interesting.... I hear tax reform is up next.
I look forward to him banning taxes altogether before he reviews the current ones.
You're really not thinking this through.Nice. Travel ban was to be put in place while they looked at what could be done to insure passenger safety on planes as well as how they could identify potential threats to the country. Of course being all wise and all knowing you've got it figured out without any effort. You should offer your services to the U.N.. I'm sure they're looking for a saviour. All the world's issues neatly worked out in a few hours.
How do you know they weren't doing the review? But they couldn't enact anything because of repeated injunctions.You're really not thinking this through.
What was stopping his administration from looking "at what could be done to insure passenger safety on planes as well as how they could identify potential threats to the country."
Travel ban or not, he could have been doing his review all along. I understand the opinion on why he wanted the travel ban that's all fine and well. But please explain to me why he couldn't do his review without it.
Trump wanted a freeze on immigration to review the vetting process. That was months ago... why have we heard nothing of this review? What has he come up with? Surely after months he's come up with a bigly beautiful yugely great plan.
Welcome to the conversation.How do you know they weren't doing the review? But they couldn't enact anything because of repeated injunctions.
I believe the Supreme Court inferred as much as well.You're really not thinking this through.
What was stopping his administration from looking "at what could be done to insure passenger safety on planes as well as how they could identify potential threats to the country."
Travel ban or not, he could have been doing his review all along. I understand the opinion on why he wanted the travel ban that's all fine and well. But please explain to me why he couldn't do his review without it.