President Trump
- Thread starter wkmac
- Start date
Yes. I believe that Mitch McConnell famously warned Harry Reid about going that route. Well, now we are now obviously down that path.
Yes. Can we agree that nobody is going back to them?
As Floridays pointed out, a simple majority is constitutionally valid. We're too partisan now for a 60 vote majority.
Why don't you guys just forget about collusion and just wait for Mueller to finish his investigation?
And does it matter if it was Page or George? The administration said all along none of its people had contact with Russia.
Obviously that was a lie. So if it wasn't collusion, what was it? And if it was all above board, why all the lies?
I immediately thought Clinton then it hit me what you meant, LOL!If you support the cause it matters not what you do under the sheets
He also tried to say changing tax policy again would require 60 votes by the next congress.
You tell us to forget about collusion then say "so if it wasn't collusion..." You know what, wouldn't surprise me if Trump was looking to increase his holdings in Russia by making the Russians happy on a few things. He's not going to be president forever and he's thinking about his kids. Wouldn't shock me at all. But to say the Russians stole the election for him, there's just nothing there, at least so far.
If the Dems control both houses still highly unlikely they'd have the 2/3rds majority needed to override Trump's veto. Which is probably what he meant.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
I thought he was done already .
Even D's in Congress agree that Mueller has failed .
floridays
Well-Known Member
Excellent, bleach and press, we must be presentable doing the peoples business. Don't forget the bonfire cordial Saturday next, order of business, Johnson's Great Society.If you support the cause it matters not what you do under the sheets
By they way, The Honorable Sheet's Bryd of West Virginia will be the featured speaker and will light our fire.
Last edited:
Stole the election for him?! You've found Maxine Waters and just about nobody else saying something like that.
Now why the president doesn't accept the findings of the intelligence community and move to secure elections is a baffling question.
I haven't seen anything like that.
floridays
Well-Known Member
And no blonde scalp has been delivered. Trump train is pickin up steam, like the orange blossom special, and if your Great White Hope Mueller doesn't deliver soon just think of the carnage to be inflicted. Not a good day to be your type. (Democrat leftists, before you try to pull the skin color charge) Today is Jan 2 2018, what's on the calendar today?
How many voting booths were hacked? None, because they aren't connected to the internet. So what exactly do you mean by "secure?" How about voter I.D.? If we're going to have "secure" elections, then why not a picture I.D. for every voter? It's required for so many things, why not voting?
For awhile the Dems from Hillary on down were saying she lost due to Russian meddling. How can that not be construed as stealing the election?
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Excellent point.
My son and I share the same first and last names and with the lack of an ID check rule where I live I could conceivably vote twice and no one would be the wiser.
floridays
Well-Known Member
It's a hardship for some to get a picture id?
Apparently.
Removing foreign fake news bots.
US intelligence is adamant that Russia and other nations seek to influence elections and go to great lengths to do so. Why continue to allow that?
