Raise for drivers 118,000 USA drivers?

[CHEMA-DELMA]

Learn how to post a picture

Sheesh
View attachment 432340

Looks like WORMA

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

Looks like WORMA

I know my break room certainly doesn't look like that

 

[TeltBender]

UPS hides their real profit margins. Reinvestment into automation, dividends, and other things leads to a lower overall net profit on paper to look like they are making less. But they are just spending more to make more in the future without as many teamsters.

We can see their investments. Are you trolling.

 

[Commercial Inside Release]

complaining they are making less now then then when they were PT

So much for "not going through progression twice..." Full time and part time are two different progressions.

You should have told them.

 

[burrheadd]

Give us a reason why the company should not create more FT inside jobs? You just sound like a jealous old man who wishes they were inside.

If you want a fulltime job be a driver if not quit bitchin

 

[burrheadd]

How $100K/yr to drive a van around considered not good pay? Sure you should get increases that match the high inflation but not more than that. Pay is already very good plus a great pension plan. Nothing to complain about as far as pay. If you are going to complain then complain about too much forced overtime, no A/C in the vans, but not the pay.

Another part time supe chimes in
Lmao
Don’t you have conference call you need to be on

 

[TeltBender]

If you want a fulltime job be a driver if not quit bitchin

are you suggesting 22.3 inside should not exist?

 

[I have NOT been lurking]

are you suggesting 22.3 inside should not exist?

He believes you should be in constant pain first

 

[Steamer]

We can see their investments. Are you trolling.

But the average person isn't adding it all up to what the net profit would be without the overhead of new investments. So it makes the net profits look lower. So that UPS can say "see, we aren't making enough to give you guys a fair share".

 

[UnionStrong]

But the average person isn't adding it all up to what the net profit would be without the overhead of new investments. So it makes the net profits look lower. So that UPS can say "see, we aren't making enough to give you guys a fair share".

Lies and subterfuge. That’s the UPS way.

 

[TeltBender]

But the average person isn't adding it all up to what the net profit would be without the overhead of new investments. So it makes the net profits look lower. So that UPS can say "see, we aren't making enough to give you guys a fair share".

Yes and then negotiators say 2 seconds later, “r u smoking crack?”

 

[Steamer]

Yes and then negotiators say 2 seconds later, “r u smoking crack?”

Sure, like they did in the 2018 contract.

 

[Northern_newage]

Wouldn’t the profit numbers be after all expenses? I mean I’m pretty dumb but isn’t the point of write offs to hide revenue? So if they show profits that’s after they pay everyone and reinvest. Or am I missing something?

 

[BigUnionGuy]

Sure, like they did in the 2018 contract.

The members didn't give our Union negotiators the tools they needed in 2018.

Let's move on....

 

[Cowboy Mac]

The members didn't give our Union negotiators the tools they needed in 2018.

Let's move on....

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

Wouldn’t the profit numbers be after all expenses? I mean I’m pretty dumb but isn’t the point of write offs to hide revenue? So if they show profits that’s after they pay everyone and reinvest. Or am I missing something?

Capital expenditures is what he's getting at, and the union has that information.