oldngray
nowhere special
The company overreaches with the contractual language regarding "recording devices".
In my opinion, that language is intended to protect the company from employees recording information or images that could be considered "proprietary".
In the OP's example, I don't foresee any trade secrets being disseminated between an On-Road Supervisor and a driver while contemplating an on-road instruction.
The company, on many occasions, produce pictures and videos to make their case against a union employee.
Why should we not be afforded the same resources in exposing a member of management who isn't playing by the rules?
They company feels it has the right to record anything they want yet try to ban employees from doing anything similar. Very definitely a double standard. If I was on the phone with UPS now I wouldn't care what UPS wanted. What are they going to do? Fire me?