You're aware that most people who join the military don't make a career of it, right?
Oh, paying more up front is most certainly the plan, along with defined contribution retirement plans. It's cheaper and more fiscally responsible. No employer should be tied down to a plan that requires providing a guaranteed salary to a person for 20 years after he's left the company.
No, I think wealth should go to those that earn it.
Look, you were making $13/hour in the 90s and quit the company, only to return a year or so later make $10 and change. Then you quit again. Then you came back again. Then you left again. You also had some fiasco in the 90s that you posted about in which you pretended to be a commodities trader or whatever and made six figures doing that, only to lose it all. I don't know what was going through that twisted mind of yours but plenty of people who started around the same time you did and endured the things that you got mad and quit over are either entering or set up to enter decent retirements.
And here you are blaming a system that would have given you a decent retirement.