Cole,
You appear to be the most sensible APWA leaning individual here. Now, I find it hard to believe an organization is promising everything under the sun and no one questions the validity. Does this not strike you as to good to be true. These claims that "with what UPS pays in we could get 7k(?) a month after 30 years". What about insurance? Isn't the amount UPS pays into CS also go toward our insurance, not retirement alone. Now is the mighty APWA going to ask for a separate contribution for insurance. Well, I'm straying from what I really want to get to. OK, UPS is "BIG". Now if you were gonna start such an adventure as APWA, why go for the whole kit and caboodle all at once?
Because to my understanding UPS must be under a single bargaining agent, so you can't just have a portion of it. The insurance issue you mentioned is a point of concern somewhat, but then again look at the part-timers, they have better insurance than most of us. The issue I have is someone did mention that Van said if UPS would give the insurance deal that they get in Ohio, he may let them handle that end, but I can't say he said that for sure. I just think all facts from every angle should be looked at.
My goodness, they are also trying to organize UPSF at the same time. Talk about too much on your plate at once. Why not go after there respective hubs first and bring to the masses the contract that they claim they will get. Heck, I could even see them going for as much as the state of NC but not the whole country. That way you can grow from there and work out the bugs. But this idea of all at once is a disaster waiting to happen and if they are successful in getting enough nationwide(in my lifetime), chaos, confusion and repercussions is sure to follow. We are talking about getting people in place nation wide to handle grievances and protect the members during the transition phase. Heck, we have trouble getting stewards now. I seriously doubt they will live up to there propaganda nor that they will succeed in getting enough to follow them. But I fear the day that they are able to achieve the total decertification. I will be seeking employment elsewhere if they do.
Again from my understanding it must be a single bargaining agent, so it's all or none. As far as the propaganda, to me personally at first it seemed like a mere pipedream, but now that we know the mechanics under the machinists union have a substantially superior pension than us in the Teamsters, I can see more the pension can be done.
Honestly you should call them and have a meeting, and bring all your questions and don't be bashful about asking the hard questions. It can be done respectfully, but ask what you want, because it is a huge step, and dangerous as well
Some have mentioned they have 22 states(?). Well why not go ahead and get those out now to show the validity behind the claim? Allspin claims UPS would still have to recognize the current contract even though we'd no longer be Teamsters. So what's to loose? I do not believe they are out to re-organize us after a decert. I honestly believe they are out to rid UPS of organized labor. Then they will weed out the most die hard unionist which will put enough fear in the rest that they will not stand up to rejoin the Teamsters or any other Union. They will all fall in line so as not to loose there job. There is too many signs to believe other wise.
Thanks for your time Cole and the level headiness you show in your post. Although we may disagree, I respect the way you present yourself.
One Van was very clear when we met with him that you can't work at UPS w/out a union, and of course we all know that. It's simply not a ma and pop operation. As far as why they don't release the info, I can only speculate that due to some of the connections to organized crime etc...there is alot of danger in coming out and basically giving ammo to those that would want to start the intimidation process, and let's not forget that there is alot of collusion with the company and union now in some areas and it's not unreasonable to believe that they could be putting people's jobs at risk.
I can understand your thoughts about weeding out etc...they will have elections, and nothing guarantees anyone a job in the APWA that I know of. Founding charter members will have the right to vote out officers by a 2/3's majority.
My personal concern is Van and Danny's experience in union affairs, because if they think UPS will roll over like a submissive puppy because the Teamsters are out (hypothetically), then they're being na'ive. I hope they are having the pro-union atty's going over everything Coleman does, because we all know how slippery some atty's can be.
Nospin and some of you others, please let us know about some of these issues, and I will get info too.
I read about the status quo that nospin wrote about and I believe he's being truthful, because we go through the same thing when our contract expires, and we're still negotiating so we stay under the old, until the new is ratified.
With CS in bad shape like it is, how can they not expect the members to react like they are, especially in light of the history at CS? How can anyone save face with the effected members, and speak up for the Teamsters? The pension has awoken people I never heard complain about anything, and the end result will be massive withdrawals, and or the company asking for total control of the pension, and getting it. Some may think that is a good idea, but I sure don't.
I appreciate your kind words to me, and I have learned to listen to people over the years rather than just cram my views on them. You have to earn respect before you get it, and everyone's opinion should matter.