104Feeders, with all due respect, handing out dues books and and getting in the face of every new ptmer and letting them know
that the union is there for them and HOW is not "holding someone's hand"-and quite frankly if it was, would there be a problem with that, if it ultimately meant a stronger union in the end, with a more-informed workforce willing to make the union-fought rules work for them (e.g. more part-timers fighting the war against supervisors working)?
As kids we have school to get us ready for life, and learn how to cope with it. Companies give orientations that consist of more than "If you need help, talk to your supervisor or some older person on your dept). Why doesn't the Union take a similar approach.
When UPS first hired me as a loader, they failed to "hold my hand", as it were, using THEIR prescribed methods with the graduated work load. You would say they set me up for failure, and so it would probably not surprise you that I bombed, causing drivers to leave late every morning and eventually prompting the Center Mgr to verbally berate me in a screaming tirade one morning. However, nothing changed until they did some training and "held my hand".
On at least three occasions in my previous driving center I was thrown cold onto a route; little wonder I did not make 9.5 during the first three weeks, if not longer, on those routes. The first route I ever learned I was the helper to the main driver for 3 days; in my current center the oncars stay with you for about a week; much less problems for UPS due to my stumblings under those scenarios.
You are basically throwing new union members "into the cold" with the current methods (making them come to you). This will not work well in the long run.
I find it ironic, given the union's democratic leaning, how much the more involved Union members position here is reminiscent of the Republican stance concerning giving people a helping hand, and being more generous with spreading the wealth.