I think they were 40Yes shorts was not an option until 1994 and I believe there was around $30 a pair back then.
After strike of 1997 we got free shorts.
I think they were 40Yes shorts was not an option until 1994 and I believe there was around $30 a pair back then.
After strike of 1997 we got free shorts.
Why not?Carol says we should all be free to express ourselves.
Maybe I would like to wear fishnets with my shorts
You maybe correctI think they were 40
Well....yes.....usuallyYou maybe correct
That's what I needed is another wifeWell....yes.....usually
Gumby on suicide watch?That's what I needed is another wife
NoGumby on suicide watch?
LMAOCarol says we should all be free to express ourselves.
Maybe I would like to wear fishnets with my shorts
Ha ha I never thought of it that way. I’d happily trade all the dumb safari hats I never wear for some socks.But we can order 5 winter jackets if wanted! Wtf
Yep. You had to buy shorts here initially. Controversy ensued immediately because of quality/standards control. Folks began to "modify/alter" them....especially the chicks. Shorter and shorter. Initially the shorts only came in near knee length. Then they added a shorter length. The argument was that "Hey, I own these shorts" by the employee. So, the company fixed that.I don't recall ever having to buy shorts--socks yes--shorts no.
CottonelleCharmin or GTFO.
Those red bears give me the creeps but that paper makes my bhole so comfy. Gotta wrap that UPS transparent TP around your hand 50 times to keep your hands clean.
That Charmin goodness is unparalleled.
Charmin or strike.
They'll take over when you go on strike.
Because they are so dependable...They'll take over when you go on strike.
Likely more so than someone carrying a picket sign.Because they are so dependable...
Yes that model is working out quite well for AmazonLikely more so than someone carrying a picket sign.
No picket signs necessary if the company negotiates fairly, up to them.Likely more so than someone carrying a picket sign.