MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
So in other words, you don't know what was in the conservative version.are you dense? do you need crayons. My point was there was no conservative version and any such usage labeling the dossier as such was inaccurate.
So in other words, you don't know what was in the conservative version.are you dense? do you need crayons. My point was there was no conservative version and any such usage labeling the dossier as such was inaccurate.
There is no liberal or conservative version of evidence.So in other words, you don't know what was in the conservative version.
That's a concept Drumpf and his defenders can't admit. They are pushing a narrative that the FBI and other intelligence agencies can't be impartial because of a few have Democratic views. They sure weren't claiming the opposite when the vast majority of those at the top of those agencies are actually Republican.There is no liberal or conservative version of evidence.
the FBI are the political police of america.That's a concept Drumpf and his defenders can't admit. They are pushing a narrative that the FBI and other intelligence agencies can't be impartial because of a few have Democratic views. They sure weren't claiming the opposite when the vast majority of those at the top of those agencies are actually Republican.
So in other words, you don't know what was in the conservative version.
the conservative version was not presented to the FISA court.
I'm not the one who is confused. Hope that helps.there was no conservative version. Hope that helps your understanding.
as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?I'm not the one who is confused. Hope that helps.
That's not what you said but for arguments sake, what would be different in a " conservative " version?as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?
That's not what you said but for arguments sake, what would be different in a " conservative " version?
So there would be no difference. Got it.as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?
as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?
what difference does it make what you think if it doesnt translate into you doing anything?So there would be no difference. Got it.
I don't have to do anything. Mueller is doing what needs to be done.what difference does it make what you think if it doesnt translate into you doing anything?
as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?So there would be no difference. Got it.
see thats the difference between you guys and snowden:I don't have to do anything. Mueller is doing what needs to be done.
You are saying there was a liberal version?as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?
as I said many times now the conservative version was not presented to the FISA Court because there was no conservative version to present. How many time would you like to play this stupid game of feigned ignorance?