ohBecause
ohBecause
Again a mailing is required to each individual member, as well as a posting in every workplace announcing the election, complete with time and place of nominations and detailed instructions for potential candidates.Correct.
But some members may never realize that nobody ran against the incumbents. There was never an election for them to vote. So they think there was never an election for new representation. Because there wasn’t.
I really don't know when we had a local election last. I don't retain information thats not important to me, until it is. Our jobs are being threatened, so now I'm interested.
The real issue is forcing delivery drivers to work in the car wash while there are FT car washers on lay off.I'm not saying he should be laid off instead of the junior 22.2 by virtue total Company seniority.
I'm saying first, he shouldn't even be in the car wash since there are full-time car washers present since before 1979.
....and two, if someone would have to vacate a bid position, it should be @PT Car Washer that would then exercise his part-time seniority to bump into the sort somewhere.
No, the real issue is that you are there as a part-timer.The real issue is forcing delivery drivers to work in the car wash while there are FT car washers on lay off.
Again a mailing is required to each individual member, as well as a posting in every workplace announcing the election, complete with time and place of nominations and detailed instructions for potential candidates.
If they didn't know, they didn't want to know.
....which is more than likely the case, as this guy clearly illustrated.
I'm not the one being laid off. They were offered the choice of working one of the sorts but why is the company forcing delivery drivers to work the car wash on OT while FT car washers are laid off?No, the real issue is that you are there as a part-timer.
....and even if they were truly laid off, why they agreed to it verses bumping into the sorts.
The Company is not required to maintain a car wash, btw....many buildings don't.
If that's the case, they are improperly laid off (instead of you) and elected to take the layoff rather than exercise their right to bump.I'm not the one being laid off. They were offered the choice of working one of the sorts but why is the company forcing delivery drivers to work the car wash on OT while FT car washers are laid off?
My liver is shutting down
My liver is shutting down
Why should he have been laid off? He has more senority than them. Company senority prevails, it doesn’t matter if you’re part time or full time. If a part timer has been with the company longer than a full timer has, they have more senority....and again, the Company is of no obligation to use part-time employees anytime for anything (including the car wash).
They do so because they are entitled to at a discount price, but if they want to pay more, they are free to.
Wrong again buckarooWhy should he have been laid off? He has more senority than them. Company senority prevails, it doesn’t matter if you’re part time or full time. If a part timer has been with the company longer than a full timer has, they have more senority
But he'll never be a feedah drivahGo smoke some wacky tobaccy I hear that cures it
Wow - you have many questionable posts - this one outs you.What is so special about being a FT delivery driver? FedEx has them, Amazon has them, Dominos has them.
Nope.Why should he have been laid off? He has more senority than them. Company senority prevails, it doesn’t matter if you’re part time or full time. If a part timer has been with the company longer than a full timer has, they have more senority
He's too much of a baby to even answer meNope.
Why should he have been laid off? He has more senority than them. Company senority prevails, it doesn’t matter if you’re part time or full time. If a part timer has been with the company longer than a full timer has, they have more senority
So how am I wrong? I could say the same thing to you, you’re wrong buckaroo, full time senority in certain areas. In his areas, it’s company senorityWrong again buckaroo
Maybe only in certain areas
Please stopWhy should he have been laid off? He has more senority than them. Company senority prevails, it doesn’t matter if you’re part time or full time. If a part timer has been with the company longer than a full timer has, they have more senority