BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Only when below 12 feet of water.Ted Kennedy.
Only when below 12 feet of water.Ted Kennedy.
Those indictments are a little tough to get when sledge hammers come in contact with laptops.11 investigations and 0 indictments.
Yeah… Ted Kennedy thing was shameful and weird to say the leastOnly when below 12 feet of water.
Never any proof that these prosecutors colluded onAre you referring to the prosecutors responsible for colluding to suppress evidence? I wonder why they wouldn't want to sign the motion to dismiss. Mystifying. Even though you are getting a very slanted and factually questionable version of events, I'm glad you are at least taking the time to learn more and have a more reasonable conversation about it.
Why do you suppose Flynn stuck his hand out and agreed to work with prosecutors for a whole year? Innocent men do not do this.Are you referring to the prosecutors responsible for colluding to suppress evidence? I wonder why they wouldn't want to sign the motion to dismiss. Mystifying. Even though you are getting a very slanted and factually questionable version of events, I'm glad you are at least taking the time to learn more and have a more reasonable conversation about it.
Why do you suppose Flynn stuck his hand out and agreed to work with prosecutors for a whole year? Innocent men do not do this.
Face it. Flynn was trying to reassure the Russians about sanctions and the FBI was running counterintelligence on it. Flynn screwed up. There's a LOT more to this saga that we never got to learn, I believe.
And yet Flynn was never charged with anything but lying to the FBI. Dead to rights, huh?Why do you suppose Flynn stuck his hand out and agreed to work with prosecutors for a whole year? Innocent men do not do this.
Face it. Flynn was trying to reassure the Russians about sanctions and the FBI was running counterintelligence on it. Flynn screwed up. There's a LOT more to this saga that we never got to learn, I believe.
And yet Flynn was never charged with anything but lying to the FBI. Dead to rights, huh?
Flynn Stormed the Capitol?His answer was "I don't remember" when asked about something on his security clearance check, which was filled out by his attorneys. He was running an international security firm when he had made the contact in question. There was no legal issues with what he was being asked about.
Biden suggested going after him on the Logan act, which was written soon after the founding of the nation to prevent British Loyalists from infiltrating the US government. Literally no one has ever been convicted under that act.
Flynn Stormed the Capitol?
Man, you dance HARD for the authoritarians, don't you?If he had, Trump would still be President, and all the swamp creatures would be sitting in Gitmo.
The subject came up because of a clip of Flynn, in which it sounds like he was saying we should have a coup like in Myanmar. He claimed it was a grammar issue.
Wrestler guy: "is there any reason we can't have a coup like in minamar [sic]?"
Flynn version 1: "There's no reason. We should have a coup here."
Flynn version 2: "There's no reason we should have a coup here."
Version 1 sounds much more like what he said, and the crowd sure seemed to hear it that way.
The way Flynn has been treated suggests to me that the establishment thinks he's a threat to their power. I'm not an advocate of a violent coup, but there is clearly a massive and self-perpetuating corruption issue in the government that needs to be addressed. If anyone can accomplish that end, I am for them. Trump and Flynn have not proven themselves capable of carrying out such a feat. At best, they've helped to shine a light on it.
Exactly. Flynn was agreeing with the idea of the "Minna-marr" redneck."That's right, that's right"
Flynn
The leads were cut by the corrupt Trump administration.And yet Flynn was never charged with anything but lying to the FBI. Dead to rights, huh?
He wasn't charged for that. And he was, as many millions were at the time, expressing an opinion, which is Constitutionally guaranteed. It's people like you, who don't like anyone saying anything out loud but what they think is allowable, who have an authoritarian bent. By the way the surest way to make someone angry with the government and want to overthrow it is to ruin them financially and threaten their family. Something that Democrats seem fine with as long as the person that's done to is a conservative white male. You reap what you sow.Man, you dance HARD for the authoritarians, don't you?
Listen to Flynn's inflection. "It should happen here." He puts a small emphasis on "should". Nobody talks like that unless they mean what it seems like they mean.
Now, do you support this? Do you support the forceful overthrow of a lawfully ordered government by the democratic will of the people?
Are you defending this fantasy of a coup d’etat in America?He wasn't charged for that. And he was, as many millions were at the time, expressing an opinion, which is Constitutionally guaranteed. It's people like you, who don't like anyone saying anything out loud but what they think is allowable, who have an authoritarian bent. By the way the surest way to make someone angry with the government and want to overthrow it is to ruin them financially and threaten their family. Something that Democrats seem fine with as long as the person that's done to is a conservative white male. You reap what you sow.
Man, you dance HARD for the authoritarians, don't you?
Listen to Flynn's inflection. "It should happen here." He puts a small emphasis on "should". Nobody talks like that unless they mean what it seems like they mean.
Now, do you support this? Do you support the forceful overthrow of a lawfully ordered government by the democratic will of the people?
Do you actually believe it was an attempted coup? Now we're talking fantasy.Are you defending this fantasy of a coup d’etat in America?
I mean Flynn’s remarks.Do you actually believe it was an attempted coup? Now we're talking fantasy.