This is not news.WOW.
Move to Russia and see how they treat the opposition.
They got caught with there pants down.
This is not news.WOW.
Move to Russia and see how they treat the opposition.
And when facts and sources culminate in a damaging story to Trump then it’s just a fake endeavor?To get to factual reporting they have to do solid research, or investigating.
You really don't follow the news on how they got some of that damaging information do you? Hillary Clinton was and is the main source for Russian stuff.And when facts and sources culminate in a damaging story to Trump then it’s just a fake endeavor?
From inheritance brat (1 million when he turned 18)And when facts and sources culminate in a damaging story to Trump then it’s just a fake endeavor?
And of course you're sophisticated and anyone who disagrees with you is a rube.A sophisticated consumer of news keeps in mind the possibility that spin is involved at all times.
I believe in the free press and its importance to a free society.And of course you're sophisticated and anyone who disagrees with you is a rube.
Trump and associates damage themselves plenty without outside help.You really don't follow the news on how they got some of that damaging information do you? Hillary Clinton was and is the main source for Russian stuff.
Trump and associates damage themselves plenty without outside help.
And the Trump people who were there?He was a idiot, along with the rest of the blm, and antifa people that were there.
To answer your question. Yes the ones that went inside of offices and stuff like that.And the Trump people who were there?
I've never argued for that. I have seen many retractions after false allegations made against conservatives. I've seen complete misrepresentations of events to push a false narrative. Examples? George Zimmerman and Nicholas Sandmann, just two of many. What I want is honest reporting. Is that too much to ask?I believe in the free press and its importance to a free society.
I will never call the free press untainted or perfect. But I’ve debated many a right-winger that has argued for its total destruction and outlawing. Nothing is more dangerous.
To answer that I have to ask, who won the 2020 presidential election?I've never argued for that. I have seen many retractions after false allegations made against conservatives. I've seen complete misrepresentations of events to push a false narrative. Examples? George Zimmerman and Nicholas Sandmann, just two of many. What I want is honest reporting. Is that too much to ask?
Who do you think that won, legally?To answer that I have to ask, who won the 2020 presidential election?
Getting FISA warrants was pretty much based on the phony Steele dossier. And Comey and company still used it after finding out it was phony to get further warrants. They lied to the court. You seem to be in denial about the lengths partisans went to have Trump removed. It was a soft coup attempt. This was the basis of the anger that drove people to storm the Capitol building.Trump and associates damage themselves plenty without outside help.
As if you don't know or that the constant attack on conservatives by the liberal media doesn't matter.To answer that I have to ask, who won the 2020 presidential election?
Biden. Otherwise I would have thought Rudy and others would have claimed voter fraud in court.Who do you think that won, legally?
You don’t understand what intelligence gathering really is and what agencies do with it.Getting FISA warrants was pretty much based on the phony Steele dossier. And Comey and company still used it after finding out it was phony to get further warrants. They lied to the court. You seem to be in denial about the lengths partisans went to have Trump removed. It was a soft coup attempt. This was the basis of the anger that drove people to storm the Capitol building.
Are you under the impression that right wing media doesn’t attack liberals?As if you don't know or that the constant attack on conservatives by the liberal media doesn't matter.