Storming the Capitol

[1989]

I have to wonder, do you actually believe this is a reasonable assessment of the situation? Or are you being intentionally misleading?

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.

www.google.com

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.

www.google.com

No one with a tiny bit of common sense believes anything Tucker says on his show.
He is not as bad as Hannity but he is working towards that level of disbelief.

 

[1989]

No one with a tiny bit of common sense believes anything Tucker says on his show.
He is not as bad as Hannity but he is working towards that level of disbelief.

But the faces he makes are over the top.

 

[Fred's Myth]

Stating fact is not attacking anyone. It's a fact this forum has turned into a racist pos haven.

Quite revealing that you’re still here and posting.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.

www.google.com

I know what that article says, and I understand the legal argument against defamation. I'm still trying to figure out if you believe what you posted, or are being intentionally misleading.

 

[oldngray]

I know what that article says, and I understand the legal argument against defamation. I'm still trying to figure out if you believe what you posted, or are being intentionally misleading.

That is a talking point they keep mindlessly parroting. The details of the case don't matter. Nor the fact they won that case.

All they care about it is as an excuse to attack Tucker. And close their minds to inconvenient facts.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

That is a talking point they keep mindlessly parroting. The details of the case don't matter. Nor the fact they won that case.

All they care about it is as an excuse to attack Tucker. And close their minds to inconvenient facts.

I know that, I just want to hear him admit to it.

 

[Sportello]

I have to wonder, do you actually believe this is a reasonable assessment of the situation? Or are you being intentionally misleading?

No one with a tiny bit of common sense believes anything Tucker says on his show.
He is not as bad as Hannity but he is working towards that level of disbelief.

Tucker will run for President soon.

 

[bottomups]

Prove it.

Prove the election was stolen.

 

[Lineandinitial]

Stating fact is not attacking anyone. It's a fact this forum has turned into a racist pos haven.

ing leave Sam…
Start a Black Lives Matter Cafe and only admit blakes.
You can fuel your hatred for the White Devil and talk about how you’re going to invest your reparation money and buy a Cadillac!

 

[The Driver]

*ing leave Sam…
Start a Black Lives Matter Cafe and only admit blakes.
You can fuel your hatred for the White Devil and talk about how you’re going to invest your reparation money and buy a Cadillac!

Really doing yourself a favor here.

 

[MAKAVELI]

*ing leave Sam…
Start a Black Lives Matter Cafe and only admit blakes.
You can fuel your hatred for the White Devil and talk about how you’re going to invest your reparation money and buy a Cadillac!

You must be hittin that meth pipe pretty hard these days, Billie Bob Joe .

 

[PT Car Washer]

Man you are some fart smeller..

Maybe, but at least I am no trump supporter.

 

[tonyexpress]

You must be hittin that meth pipe pretty hard these days, Billie Bob Joe .

It's a fact this forum has turned into a racist pos haven.

Hey Bruh, sometimes you gotta try being part of the solution instead of the problem... smh.

 

[vantexan]

Prove the election was stolen.

Explain all the odd actions by vote counters in numerous states. Explain why rules were changed last minute by people who didn't have a constitutional right to make changes. Too many anomalies. But hey, the Dems got away with it. And now are squawking about legislatures tightening the rules that would make it much more difficult to commit fraud. I'm sure between now and 2022 they'll come up with some creative solutions.

 

[Lineandinitial]

You must be hittin that meth pipe pretty hard these days, Billie Bob Joe .

No, that’s what hood rats do. Especially on your new holiday.
So……adios Buttwheat!!

 

[The Driver]

You must be hittin that meth pipe pretty hard these days, Billie Bob Joe .

This?

 

[floridays]

It's a fact this forum has turned into a racist pos haven.

Hey Bruh, sometimes you gotta try being part of the solution instead of the problem... smh.

I'm not so sure that is the truth. I'm not saying you are wrong however.

I'm not sure the are enough blacks on here to exhibit their racism against whites.
I do think there are a lot of whites that support the racism ideology for political gain, which I think is based in a Marxist takedown of our Republic.

There is no better country in the world for darker pigmentation to better their situation in life than the United States. Someone prove me wrong.

 

[newfie]

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.

www.google.com

kinda like the Obama administration arguing obamacare was legal as a tax when they told us it was no such thing. you argue what wins.

No one with a tiny bit of common sense believes anything Tucker says on his show.
He is not as bad as Hannity but he is working towards that level of disbelief.

I wouldnt be that harsh. Tucker has an opinion show. Everyone who watch's an opinion show should understand that.

 

[newfie]

Prove the election was stolen.

you would have to have an actual hearing of the evidence first which was not allowed. its a hot potato , a precedence setter no judge wants any part of.