Storming the Capitol

[Lineandinitial]

Seriously?

Aren't you aware that both written and spoken languages have to be interpreted by the listener?

And aren't you also aware that rank and file liberal's filters have been clogged for years, requiring them to be spoon-fed not only the correct interpretation, but the pre-recorded response?

Sheeesh.

I do. I was hopeful that the TDS virus was wearing itself out and some of the Libs have come to their senses and stopped being so influenced by their handlers and the corrupt “media” and could start thinking for themselves.
I guess I was wrong.

 

[Box Ox]

“And I've gotta tell you something: If Steve Bannon and I had organized that, we would have won, not to mention, it would have been armed."

most people would recognize it was mocking the dems claim that january 6th was an insurrection.

Uh huh

 

[zubenelgenubi]

I do. I was hopeful that the TDS virus was wearing itself out and some of the Libs have come to their senses and stopped being so influenced by their handlers and the corrupt “media” and could start thinking for themselves.
I guess I was wrong.

Dude, even if Trump even literally meant to suspend the constitution, that's the only time these people care about it. The rest of the time they are perfectly happy when the constitution is actually (figuritively, for those who don't understand metaphor) used as toilet paper.

 

[Next Day Error]

I do. I was hopeful that the TDS virus was wearing itself out and some of the Libs have come to their senses and stopped being so influenced by their handlers and the corrupt “media” and could start thinking for themselves.
I guess I was wrong.

Dude, even if Trump even literally meant to suspend the constitution, that's the only time these people care about it. The rest of the time they are perfectly happy when the constitution is actually (figuritively, for those who don't understand metaphor) used as toilet paper.

Nope. I always like the rule of law. And the checks and balances.

 

[bbsam]

the prospect of a constitutional remedy was more easily discussed by your side after trump won then after trump lost.

What Happens If The Election Was A Fraud? The Constitution Doesn’t Say.

What would happen if it became clear that Trump or his advisers colluded with the Russians?

fivethirtyeight.com

A constitutional remedy or disregarding the constitution altogether?

 

[bbsam]

Seriously?

Aren't you aware that both written and spoken languages have to be interpreted by the listener?

And aren't you also aware that rank and file liberal's filters have been clogged for years, requiring them to be spoon-fed not only the correct interpretation, but the pre-recorded response?

Sheeesh.

So January 6 rioters just misinterpreted? Or was it the capitol police who misu?

 

[vantexan]

Dude, even if Trump even literally meant to suspend the constitution, that's the only time these people care about it. The rest of the time they are perfectly happy when the constitution is actually (figuritively, for those who don't understand metaphor) used as toilet paper.

And yet I recently argued with some far right extremists here who think the Constitution is outdated and I'm naive to support it. Correction, I'm a fool to support it. An idiot.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

A constitutional remedy or disregarding the constitution altogether?

The constitution doesn't forbid or specifically allow for a particular remedy. I guess the founders assumed people would know what to do when an election was stolen.

 

[newfie]

A constitutional remedy or disregarding the constitution altogether?

I'm surprised your not in support of trumps point since you've had so many dem cry about having the election stolen.

Hilary alone has about 20 different reasons it was stolen. Would have been nice to see her go to court and have to either prove it or lose it.

 

[newfie]

Uh huh

 

[UnionStrong]

The constitution doesn't forbid or specifically allow for a particular remedy. I guess the founders assumed people would know what to do when an election was stolen.

There weren’t any democrats around then otherwise they would have wrote something in.

 

[bbsam]

I'm surprised your not in support of trumps point since you've had so many dem cry about having the election stolen.

Hilary alone has about 20 different reasons it was stolen. Would have been nice to see her go to court and have to either prove it or lose it.

I couldn’t name one reason Hillary had about the election being stolen. For the most part, I think I and others ignored whatever she said. I know we didn’t storm the capitol and try to hang the vice president!

And I can confirm, it is fun watching cry babies go to court and lose bigly!

 

[bbsam]

The constitution doesn't forbid or specifically allow for a particular remedy. I guess the founders assumed people would know what to do when an election was stolen.

My guess it would be taken to the courts. MTG sees it differently.

 

[bbsam]

The constitution doesn't forbid or specifically allow for a particular remedy. I guess the founders assumed people would know what to do when an election was stolen.

Maybe they figured elections wouldn’t be stolen.

Because they aren’t in this country.

 

[Jiangshi]

The constitution doesn't forbid or specifically allow for a particular remedy. I guess the founders assumed people would know what to do when an election was stolen.

The election was not stolen. Trump lost.

 

[newfie]

I couldn’t name one reason Hillary had about the election being stolen.

that does not in any way negate six years of hillary election crying

For the most part, I think I and others ignored whatever she said.

i dont see it

i could have easily listed another 20 or 30 examples of your party catering to her election denying

I know we didn’t storm the capitol and try to hang the vice president!
And I can confirm, it is fun watching cry babies go to court and lose bigly!

and the other side did not burn down any court houses or police stations or try to kill any congressmen playing charity softball or attack any supreme court justices.
they especially never had their congresswoman or others call out a vendetta on any republicans they find in the public.

face the facts your side does not own the moral high ground

 

[vantexan]

that does not in any way negate six years of hillary election crying

i dont see it

i could have easily listed another 20 or 30 examples of your party catering to her election denying



and the other side did not burn down any court houses or police stations or try to kill any congressmen playing charity softball or attack any supreme court justices.
they especially never had their congresswoman or others call out a vendetta on any republicans they find in the public.

face the facts your side does not own the moral high ground

They always have amnesia about what their side does.

 

[newfie]

They always have amnesia about what their side does.

amnesia or blinders. its like a murderer preaching the ten commandments to us.

 

[newfie]

Let me ask those 60 federal judges what they think of your side’s BS “evidence”. Oh yeah, they through the crap out of court. It’s all BS, you believe lies.

one answer for all of them. no balls to do their job. No balls hold the hearing and let the evidence either be exposed or proven BS for hillary , stacey and trump.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

My guess it would be taken to the courts. MTG sees it differently.

The courts have consistently refused to allow evidence to be presented. None of the judges wanted to stick their neck out to do their jobs. What's the remedy when one branch refuses to check another?

We'll see how a properly drafted challenge works out in Arizona.