542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
We should all be ready and willing to strike. It's our biggest weapon against corporations like UPS and we should absolutely threaten to use it. I was just asking if he's already decided that no matter what he's voting no because he's angry at the company and wants to seek revenge.Collectively our willingness to strike affects what will be on the table. There's no reason for us to take an overly "polite" stance heading into negotiations. And of course O'Brien already hasn't and isn't. But this posture won't be so effective if the membership largely tucks their tails between their legs. No. We have every reason to fire shots across the company's bow before negotiations. Not because we're hellbent on striking for the sake of striking, or else pure vengeance, but to encourage the company to come correct. The company needs to remember who moves the boxes.
I'm hearing a lot of that from people. It's why I had my signature from Confucius about revenge.