Wally
BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Not at first. Go back and look at the biased media coverage. They had them guilty.Not guilty???
Not at first. Go back and look at the biased media coverage. They had them guilty.Not guilty???
No seriously you do work for UPSTrouble is, some mentally ill people believe the lie. Look at the repressed memory cases where some therapist plants an idea.
Get him on a lie detector and lets compare results.How about we let the FBI question both Judge Kavanaugh and Dr Christine B. Ford, and then charge and imprison the one the find to be lying?
Works for me.
Wait, you're saying it is possible that Kavanaugh may be repressing the memories of his attempted rape? Very possible.Trouble is, some mentally ill people believe the lie. Look at the repressed memory cases where some therapist plants an idea.
Please cite your source.She's a nutcase her own students tell stories about.
Please cite your source.
You see, I did. Your source showed the reviews for the wrong professor.You can google it on your own.
You don't know, but the FBI does, how many thorough background checks do you think he has been through. All your side can do is throw poo against the wall. Stop the monkey business.
There are also white sodomites.I know white guys that wear their pants like that normally
I'll go one further, immediate hanging or firing squad. Let's just end this crap swiftly.How about we let the FBI question both Judge Kavanaugh and Dr Christine B. Ford, and then charge and imprison the one the find to be lying?
Works for me.
The FBI will be investigating her including talking to her students, fellow professors, her friends and family.She's a nutcase her own students tell stories about.
The FBI will be investigating her including talking to her students, fellow professors, her friends and family.
On the surface, she sounds like a confused snowflake.
Many people consider confused and snowflake redundant.
If anything happened then it would be way beyond the statue of limitations. If anyone is at risk it would be her for false accusations.
When her lawyer was asked for anything to corroborate the claims she said it would be up to the FBI to find any proof anything happened, not her.
If the Wash Post had this for months and didn't use it, there must be something wrong with the story. If they were able to run it, it would be a huge scoop, torpedo a SC nomination, and thrill their liberal subscribers. The upside to running it would be huge.Why do you assume her accusations are false?
Is that a serious question?Why do you assume her accusations are false?