newfie
Well-Known Member
it was 83 million and he wiped out twenty planes , fuel depots and numerous hardened bunkers. If you're going to sneer at least represent the facts correctly.
Syria
- Thread starter 804brown
- Start date
it was 83 million and he wiped out twenty planes , fuel depots and numerous hardened bunkers. If you're going to sneer at least represent the facts correctly.
1
10 Pt
Guest
Because the Russians have them that's why.
When we were stockpiling Anthrax we maxed out at 150,000 tons. The Russians allegedly maxed out during the same period with 265,000 tons and counting.
We've got more toys that make Anthrax look like a nonissue.
1
10 Pt
Guest
Did you see that or read that?
Assad is a quality guy and they wouldn't lie.
1
10 Pt
Guest
And the courage to protect themselves no matter what the "civilized world" thinks about it.
1
10 Pt
Guest
He doesn't have any responsibility to "dispose" of their alleged stockpile until they deploy them.
We lost 50,000 soldiers on D-Day. We could've saved alot of American lives had we had tomahawk missiles then. What were we doing over there anyway? Just doing what people with compassion do. Lay down their live for people being murdered, tortured, and raped by lawless, wicked people.
Last edited by a moderator:
1
10 Pt
Guest
At least he did something...Took a stand.
Gaddafi didn't want anything to do with the 9-11 backlash for some odd reason. Hmmm. Wondering what changed his attitude.
wait, what?
1
10 Pt
Guest
Oops. That battle cost 29,000 lives. Between 1900-2500 on the Normandy beach invasion.
The point remains: why were we there (?) and disagreeindisagreeout (driveindriveout), the master of the red x says nothing, believes in doing nothing... Ever... To help people being murdered and raped.
What goes around comes around.
Last edited by a moderator:
I support taking military action against Syria to prevent the use of chemical weapons. I would support a pre-emptive strike against North Korea to destroy their nuclear weapons program. The problem with Trump is that he's completely unpredictable and no, that's not a good thing. Is this just a one off with Syria? Who knows? Will he really do something about North Korea? Who knows? I would feel a lot better if he would actually lay out a policy and stick to it.
1
10 Pt
Guest
I agree but he's only been potus for a few months. His track record will speak for itself as time goes on. Assad needed a good punch in the mouth for some time now. Consistent responsible actions like this seems more radical because of the lameness of the last potus. Time will tell. He's not acting alone and that's a good thing.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
LMAO
1
10 Pt
Guest
Your mentality then condemns all foreign wars or conflicts we've been involved with as irresponsible?
Very telling.
Armchair quarterbacking is lame.
The USA has always been a compassionate country. Typically the first to run to aid and to protect because we've been blessed and have conviction. Watching innocent people be slaughtered and doing nothing is being a responsible global partner? Is being a brave country with morals? I hope the attitude you portray isn't what we're becoming.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
I was laughing at you saying Trump is "consistent" and/or "responsible". He is anything but consistent, and responsible..... lol.
In regards to armchair quarterbacking, you're wrong. I'm not trying to quarterback, I'm suggesting we stay out of the game all together. There are no winners.
Responsible global partner? Who is our partner exactly? Sure does seem like it's all on us doesn't it? That's how you neocons like it though, team america world police.
1
10 Pt
Guest
He's been in office for a few weeks and you're judging his foreign policy to respond to deployment of weapons of mass destruction?
Your statement doesn't show anything except a preparedness to defame. Stay out of the game? We're all in the game whether we close our eyes to what's going on or not. Good luck with that.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Riiiiighht, we don't have a choice, we have to do something right?
Even if it's the wrong thing to do, we at least have to unzip and wave our dick around a little bit to show how big and "moral" we are.....
First you say his consistent responsible actions are a change from the previous administration, then you say he's only been in office a few weeks and we can't judge him on it.
Which is it? Is he consistent, or is he new in office and can't be judged yet?
If Obama had done what Trump did some of you would be having orgasms. But Trump can't win with you. You had a President who told us all is well in the Middle East, then lied about Benghazi to cover up before the election that all wasn't well. Drew a red line that no one respected in Syria. Said they no longer had nerve gas, then they demonstrated the other day that they did. Said we no longer had to worry about Iran and nukes, but Iran's actions since signing the deal says we have plenty to worry about. Got caught on an open microphone saying tell Putin to be patient and wait until after he got re-elected and yet you accuse Trump of colluding with the Russians(with no evidence according to former Obama security officials). And it appears they played fast and loose with the law to spy on their political opponents. And yet you defend them because you so hate Republicans. Trump gave a proportional response to warn Assad not to go further with the chemical weapons, and you crow that he didn't leave the airbase in a giant crater. What would Obama have done? Based on his track record probably not much.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
There you go blabbering on about Obama again.....
Move on man.
It's a fair question. You belittle Trump all the time when he doesn't have the time in office necessary to make a decent assessment. I can see why you don't want to look to closely at Obama's record.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
What was the question?
All I saw was a wall of text written by someone who is obsessed with Barack Obama.
You blast Trump all day long but if I say anything about Obama I'm obsessed. We're still dealing with the fallout of his lack of leadership. Stop trying to cover for him.
