I ask you about how long you worked at ups and how long you had the tats
If you knew that ups has policy about tats then why would you get them in a visible area
Perhaps it was because he assumed that, since
other drivers were allowed to cover their tats that he would be accorded the same rights.
This isn't about his choice of tats, or where they are located, or what people think of them.
UPS has a policy that drivers must cover their tats. Fine, he is willing and able to do that. Why is he being singled out and denied an opportunity that others are being granted?
I don't have a dog in this fight, and personally I am not a big fan of tats on hands or other visible parts of the body, but the fact of the matter is that the guy pays dues to the same union the rest of us do and it doesn't sound to me like he is getting much in return.