LOL...I'm certain the liberal Fake News Outlets are ready to kill each other to get more of this "scoop".
The South probably wasn't onboard with that amendment because they were well aware of the U.S. government's propensity for breaking their word. But I think enough has already been pointed out by others here of the statements made by Southern states of their concerns about the North wanting to end slavery. Look at it this way. The North forced the end of slavery with the war. But the South continued for at least 100 years or so to openly discriminate against and harm blacks. I live in what at one time was considered one of the most racist counties in the U.S. Our sheriff made international news killing a couple of blacks in his custody. Even the Soviets commented on it. That was a long time after the Civil War ended. Anyone who thinks the war didn't involve slavery at all considering the abolitionist movement at the time is kidding himself.
I don't love hearing liberals literally make everything about race. Just a couple weeks ago someone was pointing out that because most of these robots being developed are colored white then there must be a racial element to it. Some white guy was doing great things with his charity providing fresh, clean water to villages in Africa. The Left made it racist because he was white. Do y'all ever listen to yourselves? The list of what is interpreted as racist seems endless.
LOL…. Obsessed much?
Please, tell me about Federal taxes before the Civil War. Are we speaking about tariffs?Where? An AA from Devry Institute???WGAF
"Free" = Free
"Cost" = Not Free
Do you see the economic tie in there?
Besides what do you think would happen if the South had to pay for labor they previously did not have to?
Did you have any 100-level classes in Economics? Did they cover Fed taxation during that period.
The Secretary of State in Maine is faulted in her reasoning.
Sup, Q?
.
