The 2024 Presidential Race Thread

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Are those dozen cities the places that suck or don't suck here?
The EC was a compromise to appease the slaver South. We are way beyond this now I would hope.

National popular vote to pick our president. Politicians shouldn’t be allowed to draw their own districts so that the people can pick their politicians, not the other way around for Congress.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Where tf did you come up with this?
The Electoral College wasn’t designed solely to appease the slaveholding South, but slavery’s influence on its creation is undeniable. When the Founding Fathers debated the method for electing the president, they were faced with various tensions, including balancing power between large and small states, and between Northern and Southern interests. While the idea of a national popular vote was considered, it raised concerns about disproportionately favoring states with large populations. Given that the South’s economy and political power relied on slavery, Southern states had a vested interest in a system that would maintain their influence.

The Three-Fifths Compromise already gave Southern states added representation by counting three-fifths of the enslaved population in determining seats in the House of Representatives. This calculation carried over to the Electoral College, which assigns electors based on the combined total of each state’s senators and representatives. Thus, the Electoral College system effectively enhanced Southern influence by allowing states with large enslaved populations to gain more electoral votes, despite those enslaved individuals having no political rights or voice.

This structure helped ensure the South would not be outvoted by the more populous North and contributed to a balance that Southern delegates felt comfortable with. Some historians argue that the need to protect slavery was not the sole driver behind the Electoral College, but it was a significant factor in the final design. The system ultimately allowed the Southern states to wield outsized influence in early U.S. presidential elections, helping preserve their interests for decades.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
The Electoral College wasn’t designed solely to appease the slaveholding South, but slavery’s influence on its creation is undeniable. When the Founding Fathers debated the method for electing the president, they were faced with various tensions, including balancing power between large and small states, and between Northern and Southern interests. While the idea of a national popular vote was considered, it raised concerns about disproportionately favoring states with large populations. Given that the South’s economy and political power relied on slavery, Southern states had a vested interest in a system that would maintain their influence.

The Three-Fifths Compromise already gave Southern states added representation by counting three-fifths of the enslaved population in determining seats in the House of Representatives. This calculation carried over to the Electoral College, which assigns electors based on the combined total of each state’s senators and representatives. Thus, the Electoral College system effectively enhanced Southern influence by allowing states with large enslaved populations to gain more electoral votes, despite those enslaved individuals having no political rights or voice.

This structure helped ensure the South would not be outvoted by the more populous North and contributed to a balance that Southern delegates felt comfortable with. Some historians argue that the need to protect slavery was not the sole driver behind the Electoral College, but it was a significant factor in the final design. The system ultimately allowed the Southern states to wield outsized influence in early U.S. presidential elections, helping preserve their interests for decades.
Blah blah, blah, white slave owners, blah blah, blah white slave owners, racist, blah blah blah
 
The Electoral College wasn’t designed solely to appease the slaveholding South, but slavery’s influence on its creation is undeniable. When the Founding Fathers debated the method for electing the president, they were faced with various tensions, including balancing power between large and small states, and between Northern and Southern interests. While the idea of a national popular vote was considered, it raised concerns about disproportionately favoring states with large populations. Given that the South’s economy and political power relied on slavery, Southern states had a vested interest in a system that would maintain their influence.

The Three-Fifths Compromise already gave Southern states added representation by counting three-fifths of the enslaved population in determining seats in the House of Representatives. This calculation carried over to the Electoral College, which assigns electors based on the combined total of each state’s senators and representatives. Thus, the Electoral College system effectively enhanced Southern influence by allowing states with large enslaved populations to gain more electoral votes, despite those enslaved individuals having no political rights or voice.

This structure helped ensure the South would not be outvoted by the more populous North and contributed to a balance that Southern delegates felt comfortable with. Some historians argue that the need to protect slavery was not the sole driver behind the Electoral College, but it was a significant factor in the final design. The system ultimately allowed the Southern states to wield outsized influence in early U.S. presidential elections, helping preserve their interests for decades.
So it is, but it's not, but it kind of is.

Gotcha.

Each state in the republic is fairly represented, as it should be.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member

Saw she was doing better than expected in Kansas too.

I’ve read a lot of Puerto Ricans are upset about the comments at Trump rally and could effect the already super close Pennsylvania, who knows if that’s true though
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member

Saw she was doing better than expected in Kansas too.

I’ve read a lot of Puerto Ricans are upset about the comments at Trump rally and could effect the already super close Pennsylvania, who knows if that’s true though
She’s over-performing expectations in Iowa as well.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
She’s over-performing expectations in Iowa as well.
IMG_0316.jpeg
 
Top