The end of girl’s sports

[Operational needs]

These guys are SO spot on! I love this comment of theirs.... "you don't care about the sport, you don't care about other women, you dont even care about other men. You only care about yourself"

 

[Fred's Myth]

These guys are SO spot on! I love this comment of theirs.... "you don't care about the sport, you don't care about other women, you dont even care about other men. You only care about yourself"

And therein lies the fundamental problem of transgenders.

 

[Operational needs]

I love that she is speaking up.

Nikki Haley calls Biden's executive order about transgender athletics an 'attack on women's rights'

Nikki Haley has joined voices in opposition of President Biden’s executive order calling on schools to allow transgender athletes to participate in the sport of their gender identity, arguing in a column published Monday that it’s an “attack on women’s rights.”

www.foxnews.com

This is her article.

We Must Protect Women’s Sports | National Review

Joe Biden’s recent executive order was framed as a matter of transgender rights. But really, it was an attack on women’s rights.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[It will be fine]

I love that she is speaking up.

Nikki Haley calls Biden's executive order about transgender athletics an 'attack on women's rights'

Nikki Haley has joined voices in opposition of President Biden’s executive order calling on schools to allow transgender athletes to participate in the sport of their gender identity, arguing in a column published Monday that it’s an “attack on women’s rights.”

www.foxnews.com

This is her article.

We Must Protect Women’s Sports | National Review

Joe Biden’s recent executive order was framed as a matter of transgender rights. But really, it was an attack on women’s rights.

www.nationalreview.com

She’s pandering to Republican primary voters.

 

[Operational needs]

She’s pandering to Republican primary voters.

Or she’s using her power to speak up for girls and women.

 

[Box Ox]

Or she’s using her power to speak up for girls and women.

Haley 2024!

 

[Sportello]

Haley 2024!

Hell no!

 

[El Correcto]

I love that she is speaking up.

Nikki Haley calls Biden's executive order about transgender athletics an 'attack on women's rights'

Nikki Haley has joined voices in opposition of President Biden’s executive order calling on schools to allow transgender athletes to participate in the sport of their gender identity, arguing in a column published Monday that it’s an “attack on women’s rights.”

www.foxnews.com

This is her article.

We Must Protect Women’s Sports | National Review

Joe Biden’s recent executive order was framed as a matter of transgender rights. But really, it was an attack on women’s rights.

www.nationalreview.com

The only thing I care about in this debate is state laws and the constitution as a whole.
What is state law first and what federal rights is it violating?

I haven’t looked into it much at all but if it becomes a huge issue I’ll hear the argument in favor of letting someone born male compete against women or risk setting a precedent for government to violate the bill of rights.

 

[It will be fine]

The only thing I care about in this debate is state laws and the constitution as a whole.
What is state law first and what federal rights is it violating?

I haven’t looked into it much at all but if it becomes a huge issue I’ll hear the argument in favor of letting someone born male compete against women or risk setting a precedent for government to violate the bill of rights.

Discrimination based on sex. Recent SCOTUS ruling says you can’t discriminate based on a person’s sex.

If it’s ok for Jill to date men and talk about it in the office, it’s ok for Bob to date men and talk about it in the office. If it’s ok for Jill to wear makeup and a dress to work, it’s ok for Bob to wear makeup and a dress to work.

Seems simple to me.

 

[Babagounj]

Yet UPS does not allow me to wear my kilt while working.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Discrimination based on sex. Recent SCOTUS ruling says you can’t discriminate based on a person’s sex.

If it’s ok for Jill to date men and talk about it in the office, it’s ok for Bob to date men and talk about it in the office. If it’s ok for Jill to wear makeup and a dress to work, it’s ok for Bob to wear makeup and a dress to work.

Seems simple to me.

So your argument is that there should not be separate sports leagues for men and women.

 

[rod]

So your argument is that there should not be separate sports leagues for men and women.

Let them play with the boys and get crushed. They been asking for equal rights for years--give it to them. TOTALLY EQUAL IN EVERYTHING. I'm also in favor of letting them fight the next few wars by themselves (drafted by the way). Lord knows us guys haven't been too successful at it thanks to the politicians stupid ways of fighting wars now days.

 

[Operational needs]

Discrimination based on sex. Recent SCOTUS ruling says you can’t discriminate based on a person’s sex.

If it’s ok for Jill to date men and talk about it in the office, it’s ok for Bob to date men and talk about it in the office. If it’s ok for Jill to wear makeup and a dress to work, it’s ok for Bob to wear makeup and a dress to work.

Seems simple to me.

You’re comparing apples to oranges. No one (many of us) cares if Bob wants to wear a dress and makeup to work. It’s not even close to being the same as “born men” competing with “born women” in sports.

 

[Operational needs]

The only thing I care about in this debate is state laws and the constitution as a whole.
What is state law first and what federal rights is it violating?

I haven’t looked into it much at all but if it becomes a huge issue I’ll hear the argument in favor of letting someone born male compete against women or risk setting a precedent for government to violate the bill of rights.

Yeah, I highly doubt the founding fathers were thinking about transgender rights when they were writing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Lol.

 

[It will be fine]

You’re comparing apples to oranges. No one (many of us) cares if Bob wants to wear a dress and makeup to work. It’s not even close to being the same as “born men” competing with “born women” in sports.

He was asking about the constitutional question involved. I offered my understanding of the SCOTUS ruling on discrimination based on sex. Sometimes freedom comes with a cost. We protect the rights of the minority here.

 

[Operational needs]

He was asking about the constitutional question involved. I offered my understanding of the SCOTUS ruling on discrimination based on sex. Sometimes freedom comes with a cost. We protect the rights of the minority here.

I’m all for protecting the rights of the minority except when those rights far outweigh the rights of the vast majority.

 

[Fred's Myth]

He was asking about the constitutional question involved. I offered my understanding of the SCOTUS ruling on discrimination based on sex. Sometimes freedom comes with a cost. We protect the rights of the minority here.

So hermaphrodites can’t be discriminated against.

Interesting.

 

[El Correcto]

He was asking about the constitutional question involved. I offered my understanding of the SCOTUS ruling on discrimination based on sex. Sometimes freedom comes with a cost. We protect the rights of the minority here.

I don’t think it is as cut and dry as a title IX argument for this. Seperate girls and boys sport haven’t been deemed unconstitutional.

 

[rod]

You can't have it both ways. Either the sexes are EQUAL in EVERYTHING or they aren't.

Yeah, I highly doubt the founding fathers were thinking about transgender rights when they were writing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Lol.

I don't know about that. They look awfully cute in their gay clothes and powder white wigs.

 

[It will be fine]

I’m all for protecting the rights of the minority except when those rights far outweigh the rights of the vast majority.

Lol. That is a ridiculous standard.