It's not hysteria.....Florida was considering it and Oklahoma banned it......
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nned-Oklahoma-US-state-veto-Islamic-code.html
That FOX News video distorts what actually happened. The Judge didn't rule "in accordance with Sharia" or "hand down a ruling based on Sharia". The two parties in the case had previously (amongst themselves) to resolve their dispute with binding arbitration under Islamic law. They are within their rights to so, the only thing the judge did was uphold the arbitration that both parties had agreed to which was the correct thing to do as long as nothing in the arbitration conflicted with Florida law. Read more here.It was a judge in Florida.... http://video.foxnews.com/v/4606237/sharia-law-upheld-in-the-us
That FOX News video distorts what actually happened. The Judge didn't rule "in accordance with Sharia" or "hand down a ruling based on Sharia". The two parties in the case had previously (amongst themselves) to resolve their dispute with binding arbitration under Islamic law. They are within their rights to so, the only thing the judge did was uphold the arbitration that both parties had agreed to which was the correct thing to do as long as nothing in the arbitration conflicted with Florida law. Read more here.
whatever fredex, I didn't make up the stuff from thin air....out of all 57 states (per Obama) I remembered it being a judge in Florida and it was. So don't accuse me of making up stuff or worse, lying. And I can't be hysterical after a hysterectomy....my hysterical was removed.
psss mrfedup , i'll let you in on a little secret. muslim camps are already here, they tend to recruit mostly from our prisons. no outsiders are allowed passed their armed gates. and there have been reports of them training and using members as assassins. keep it under your hat, we don't want to scare anyone.
So Fox (who reports and lets you decide) reported the story and moreluck and others decided that the judge must be a muslim extremist sympathizer...or as you said more likely Fox distorted the report from the beginning.That FOX News video distorts what actually happened. The Judge didn't rule "in accordance with Sharia" or "hand down a ruling based on Sharia". The two parties in the case had previously (amongst themselves) to resolve their dispute with binding arbitration under Islamic law. They are within their rights to so, the only thing the judge did was uphold the arbitration that both parties had agreed to which was the correct thing to do as long as nothing in the arbitration conflicted with Florida law. Read more here.
Check Dearborn Michigan............they have the largest concentration of muslims in N. America.....like a third of the population...Right. Where do you get this crap? If you know about it, don't you think our intelligence agencies do too? The last few bombers have been foiled by agents who have "joined". Psst, Ali Baba, we know you are secretly a Muslim and pretending to be anti-Muslim to throw the Feds off your trail. I won't tell.
Right. Where do you get this crap? If you know about it, don't you think our intelligence agencies do too? The last few bombers have been foiled by agents who have "joined". Psst, Ali Baba, we know you are secretly a Muslim and pretending to be anti-Muslim to throw the Feds off your trail. I won't tell.
That FOX News video distorts what actually happened. The Judge didn't rule "in accordance with Sharia" or "hand down a ruling based on Sharia". The two parties in the case had previously (amongst themselves) to resolve their dispute with binding arbitration under Islamic law. They are within their rights to so, the only thing the judge did was uphold the arbitration that both parties had agreed to which was the correct thing to do as long as nothing in the arbitration conflicted with Florida law. Read more here.
Actually ,in the video, they weren't distorting the case as much as they were discussing the case just like any three lawyers would do. If you've ever witnessed a trial, lawyers do distort the truth in a manner to make their argument sound more reasonable. By the end of the tape, it was plain to me that the Judge probably made the correct decision and after reading the link you provided I haven't changed my mind.It's futile to argue with a brick, unless you actually speak brick.
Since I don't speak idiot, you'll need to explain what you mean here.It's futile to argue with a brick, unless you actually speak brick.
ahh they are assassins , not bombers.quite a difference, you know that lone gunman that DHS can't predict.Right. Where do you get this crap? If you know about it, don't you think our intelligence agencies do too? The last few bombers have been foiled by agents who have "joined". Psst, Ali Baba, we know you are secretly a Muslim and pretending to be anti-Muslim to throw the Feds off your trail. I won't tell.
ahh they are assassins , not bombers.quite a difference, you know that lone gunman that DHS can't predict.