Indeed. It's illegal to enter a classified information-free attack planning chat on Signal even if you were invited to it.
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
- Thread starter Wally
- Start date
Indeed. It's illegal to enter a classified information-free attack planning chat on Signal even if you were invited to it.
Did I say he should? Have you not been reading the thread? As I've said a gazillion times the matter should be investigated and if anyone did something illegal then hold them accountable. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Indian h1b visa workers?
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
how could anyone have done anything illegal lmao. You said the government said it wasn’t a big deal and you’re not worried and you said nothing discussed was classified or sensitive information, so what possibly could be illegal and needed to investigate?
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Thats exactly what I’m saying, and you’re arguing with me about it
What’s your point?
Doesn’t have clearance for what? Clearance is for classified and sensitive information, which you have been claiming it is none of those things
For non classified and sensitive information. For this exact reason
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Who needs rules anyway
Where we’re going we won’t need rules
Where we’re going we won’t need rules
You're focused on what the text was. The national security issue is that someone without a security clearance was on a text circle where participants needed to have a top secret clearance to be on it. And there's something else beyond that even. A need to know. Someone can have a top secret clearance but not be privy to what is being discussed by certain officials on certain topics.
AND FOR THE TRILLIONTH TIME, I didn't say someone did anything illegal. I said the matter should be investigated and IF, IF, IF someone did something illegal they should be held accountable. Either someone made a mistake, or blunder, and they need to make sure it doesn't happen again, or someone may have had a sinister motive for including that reporter. That's why you investigate, to ascertain the truth. Why is this difficult to understand?
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Dance dance dance dance dance dance
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
No matter what the investigation finds you’ll just move those goalposts again.
You called them a bunch of politicians. They aren't. They're charged with keeping the country secure. People without top secret clearances don't just get to sit in and listen to what's being discussed. Again you're focused on what they said in this specific instance but the nature of their work means they will talk about many things that most people don't have the right to hear. No matter how important you think you are there are sensitive matters that are best kept secret. Your Trump hating liberal reporter didn't have a right to be there and it was a blunder allowing him on.
Can only imagine what that looks like with your white man rhythm.
If someone did something illegal hold them accountable. What more can I say than that? I didn't stoop to your level.
El Correcto
god is dead
Who did you vote for?
El Correcto
god is dead
That’s because you are already four or five below.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
But you said there was nothing classified being discussed, Why would they need to have security clearance to talk about issues that are not classified?
Right. So, again, they shouldn’t have been talking about these issues on a platform that is so easy for a person without security clearance to join without others knowing about it
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
exactly, and that’s what happened, which is why it’s a big deal. Yet you’re continuously downplaying it and arguing with us who are bringing this exact point up
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
The only people who possibly did something illegal is the Trump administration officials talking about military actions on an unsecured platform
Yet you have made most of the focus on the reporter who was invited to it
