Time for something different? Johnson- Weld
- Thread starter tonyexpress
- Start date
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Yet...here we are.
I don't like either candidate (that might win).
My guess is Johnson won't win.
Take it from there.
It is only because the libertarian candidate(s) don't have the name recognition. If they were "mainstream" and aloud to debate this would change things dramatically in my opinion.
Both Hillary and Donald are bad choices for Americans.
Both Hillary and Donald are bad choices for Americans.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
It is only because the libertarian candidate(s) don't have the name recognition. If they were "mainstream" and aloud to debate this would change things dramatically in my opinion.
Both Hillary and Donald are bad choices for Americans.
Don't you find it a bit ironic that the candidates no one has ever heard of cannot were unable to name even just one foreign leader, past or present?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Not true. Try again.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
They can't even get the support of Ron Paul.It is only because the libertarian candidate(s) don't have the name recognition. If they were "mainstream" and aloud to debate this would change things dramatically in my opinion.
Both Hillary and Donald are bad choices for Americans.
Sad and weak.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Gary Johnson could win. Apparently you don't know much about how the electorate works.
TTKU
Gary Johnson stands by being skeptical of elected officials, foreign leaders
Libertarian Candidate Gary Johnson said Tuesday that he can not name a foreign leader he admires because he's "skeptical" about all politicians.
"I'm a real skeptic, so I point out an elected leader, foreign leader that I admire and all of a sudden I have to defend them against things that I'm not even aware of," he told CNN's Alisyn Camerota on "New Day." "So in that context, Alisyn, look, if that's a disqualifier to run for president, so be it."
What I find ironic is that having an honest candidate is a cold hard slap in the face for some.
How's that hope and change you voted for twice working out?
...
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Working out quite well. I haven';t worked a day in the last 8 years, yet my net wealth has increased due to a rising economy. Are you worse off today than 8 years ago?
How's that hope and change you voted for twice working out?
...
I seriously doubt it.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
TTKU
Gary Johnson stands by being skeptical of elected officials, foreign leaders
Libertarian Candidate Gary Johnson said Tuesday that he can not name a foreign leader he admires because he's "skeptical" about all politicians.
"I'm a real skeptic, so I point out an elected leader, foreign leader that I admire and all of a sudden I have to defend them against things that I'm not even aware of," he told CNN's Alisyn Camerota on "New Day." "So in that context, Alisyn, look, if that's a disqualifier to run for president, so be it."
What I find ironic is that having an honest candidate is a cold hard slap in the face for some.
How's that hope and change you voted for twice working out?
...
I have done quite well over the past 8 years. You?
He's a problem solver, he gets things done. He is not a maniac or a liar.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
He is an unknown commodity.
Do we really want an unknown commodity leading our country?
Because the media avoids at all cost anything Gary Johnson.
Keep you head in the sand and pick one of the other two outstanding candidates then.
Keep you head in the sand and pick one of the other two outstanding candidates then.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Because the media avoids at all cost anything Gary Johnson.
Keep you head in the sand and pick one of the other two outstanding candidates then.
I plan on voting for a candidate more qualified than any of the three---"None of the above"
Catatonic
Nine Lives
When the known commodities are unacceptable? Yes!
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
That's the explanation he came up with later?
Why didn't he just say that in the first place - it would have been a much better interview.
Instead, he seemed a little mumbly-bumbly.
Oh well, I guess even Johnson supporters aren't immune to the spin!
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Sounds like your'e the one who isn't immune to the spin.
I wish I could say exactly the right thing at all times.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Doesn't strike you as the explanation you come up with later to fix it after?
Think about it.
If that was Johnson's problem, that he couldn't think of a leader he actually admired, why wouldn't he just say that?
Why?
Instead, he looked like an idiot.
That was his plan? To look stupid?
"I'm having an Aleppo moment".
That was his plan?
K.
Similar threads
