Heard it through the grapevine. Not much longer would the government be mine.Heard it on the radio. Lol
Heard it through the grapevine. Not much longer would the government be mine.Heard it on the radio. Lol
So fast that not one court has not thrown his claims out.![]()
Just keep donating your retirement to the grifter.Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Many of the court cases being filed all over the Country are not ours, but rather those of people that have seen horrible abuses. Our big cases showing the unconstitutionality of the 2020 Election, & the outrage of things that were done to change the outcome, will soon be filed!
Guess they would have to be filed first. ttku![]()
I haven't sent him a penny. But you'll be sending of pennies your Biden if he gets in. Taxes gonna skyrocket! But you're used to Newsom, so there's that. lmao.Just keep donating your retirement to the grifter.![]()
I'd go the extra mile and say ... it is impossible.The problem is even if she can prove the software was designed to change votes it is almost impossible to go back and find which votes were changed.
Heard it on the radio. Lol
Pennsylvania obviously violated the constitution when they changed their election laws without the legislature.It could but that would mean a court would be brave enough to follow the law instead of playing safe and avoid the issue.
Plus those voting machines had the flaw (feature?) of changes made not being logged.I'd go the extra mile and say ... it is impossible.
Once that security envelope and the ballot are separated, it is impossible.
That's why this needs to be investigated by Republican state DAs.Plus those voting machines had the flaw (feature?) of changes made not being logged.
Isn't that 6-3 conservative with one of those conservatives a bit flaky(Roberts)? I don't see Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barret turning their backs on Trump since he nominated them. Clarence Thomas sure won't. Or Alito.Pennsylvania obviously violated the constitution when they changed their election laws without the legislature.
The supreme court is split 4/4 liberal/conservative, +Roberts who cares most about public opinion. Even if they do the right thing and declare PA's actions unconstitutional, there's no way they'll throw out the votes. Most likely they'll signal that the state legislature should act.
They won't, and the PA Republicans who allow the sham election to stand should be prinaried be and replaced.
That's why this needs to be investigated by Republican state DAs.
FBI cannot be trusted and DimWits and Silicon Valley will do everything to keep an investigation from happening.
Well however you see the justices' ideological leanings, I find it hard to imagine they will dictate the votes be discarded because Democrats rigged the game. I think they will suggest the state decide.Isn't that 6-3 conservative with one of those conservatives a bit flaky(Roberts)? I don't see Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barret turning their backs on Trump since he nominated them. Clarence Thomas sure won't. Or Alito.
Why do you cuckservatives hate the military?Sidney Powell: Smartmatic Voting Machine’s Chairman of the Board Peter Neffenger Named to Joe Biden’s ‘Transition Team’
![]()
Sidney Powell: Smartmatic Voting Machine's Chairman of the Board Peter Neffenger Named to Joe Biden's 'Transition Team' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Peter Neffenger is a former Coast Guard Commander who served as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration from July 2015 to January 20, 2017.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Judges wouldn't do anything before the election because people who complained didn't have standing because they couldn't show they had been harmed. After the election the votes are all mixed together so too late to fix things. Only remedy would be really drastic measures courts are unlikely to take.Well however you see the justices' ideological leanings, I find it hard to imagine they will dictate the votes be discarded because Democrats rigged the game. I think they will suggest the state decide.
At the end of the day the appointment of electors is on the state. I doubt they will have the balls to the right thing.
Exactly ... the National Government cannot be trusted with the responsibility of investigating this voting software/hardware system.Sidney Powell: Smartmatic Voting Machine’s Chairman of the Board Peter Neffenger Named to Joe Biden’s ‘Transition Team’
![]()
Sidney Powell: Smartmatic Voting Machine's Chairman of the Board Peter Neffenger Named to Joe Biden's 'Transition Team' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Peter Neffenger is a former Coast Guard Commander who served as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration from July 2015 to January 20, 2017.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Just the military that are Democrat ... no Democrat can be trusted.Why do you cuckservatives hate the military?
No offense intended, but I hope you're wrong.Well however you see the justices' ideological leanings, I find it hard to imagine they will dictate the votes be discarded because Democrats rigged the game. I think they will suggest the state decide.
At the end of the day the appointment of electors is on the state. I doubt they will have the balls to the right thing.
But we're talking the integrity of the presidential election. If they won't take that on then what good are they for? Basically they've over the decades acquiesced to the Left. If there's real proof of voter fraud in the choosing of the world's most powerful position this is a hill they should be willing to die on.Judges wouldn't do anything before the election because people who complained didn't have standing because they couldn't show they had been harmed. After the election the votes are all mixed together so too late to fix things. Only remedy would be really drastic measures courts are unlikely to take.