I can certainly agree with that.To clarify; once this guy made his decision, the outcome would not have been affected by a ban on the sale of high capacity magazines. It would not have been affected by a 7-day waiting period. It would not have been affected by background checks, or by creating a "gun free zone" where the murders occured, or by banning open carry, or by requiring guns to be registered, or any of the other multitude of useless"feel good" laws that the anti-gun crowd clamors for every time a murder with a gun takes place.
You know what might have stopped this from happening? Imagine if he had showed up at that rally and found himself surrounded by law-abiding citizens who were all openly carrying. Unless he was truly suicidal, he may very well have had second thoughts about opening fire if he knew that it would probably cost him his life. And if he was truly suicidal, and truly motivated to kill, then he could have just as easily gotten on the Internet and learned how to make a backpack bomb using materials readily available at any hardware store. He would not have needed access to a gun to do what he did.
If there is a failure here, it is a failure in the manner in which our society monitors, diagnoses, and treats the mentally ill.
Can't disagree with that, however the school that he was kicked out of never reported it to anyone else. (at least from what I have heard on the news) So his name would not have appeared on the shared list. The big issue is the maintaining of a reliable data list that can be accessed.I think at the very least when someone has been kicked out of college because he has been deemed mentally ill to to the point that he is a danger to others, that same person should not be able to just walk into a gun store and buy a Glock. Cross checking data bases to make this information available at the POS is not in any way an impossible task. I'm an advocate of private gun ownership, but there really should be mechanisms in place to keep guns out of the hands of people who are clearly crazy and many of them are just common sense.
insurance doesn't necessarily have anything to do with it, in most cases of people being IDed as mentally ill it is the state that pays for court ordered evaluations. Most mentally ill people don't voluntarily submit themselves for evaluation because the believe they are OK, it's everyone else that is insane. So stop making stuff up/.Wihout medical insurance, it still remains pretty hard to get diagnosed.
Otherwise, any school, employer, family member, or an ex spouse, etc, could take your gun-rights away, by simply filing a complaint.
I think at the very least when someone has been kicked out of college because he has been deemed mentally ill to to the point that he is a danger to others, that same person should not be able to just walk into a gun store and buy a Glock. Cross checking data bases to make this information available at the POS is not in any way an impossible task. I'm an advocate of private gun ownership, but there really should be mechanisms in place to keep guns out of the hands of people who are clearly crazy and many of them are just common sense.
Wihout medical insurance, it still remains pretty hard to get diagnosed.
Otherwise, any school, employer, family member, or an ex spouse, etc, could take your gun-rights away, by simply filing a complaint.
So, in this case, you need more "states-people" visting residential homes.
To evaulate their citizens on a regular basis. (cause not everyone is a criminal, and hasn't had run in with the law) - just like this guy.
When was the last time you were evaulated?
He didn't go to school anymore, or to work.
Bingo!!!! Thats fits you perfect!!!!
I'm sure there are plenty of people that do the same, homeless people, too.
You mean that they dont work and drink all day and are wards of the state?
They all need a visit from the state !
I heard someone from AA will vist if you ask for help...
Truthfully, I'm surprised that Safeway stayed closed for this long.The Safeway where the shooting took place is back open today.....life goes on...altered forever for some. The work of the gov't needs to start again also. One week off is respectful time enough.
I'm sure you came across some mentally challenged people in your life, be it UPS customers, or at a department/grocery store, or social events.
Or on internet forums.
Do you question them if they have regular, ongoing, medical care, take their medication as ordered, and if not, do you report them ?
I try.
Here, and in Germany, over 99% of all mentally ill people are first diagnosed by a physcian. Some as young as newborns, some in older years.
About 49 or so?
No idea where you got the idea I was presenting a solution of any kind. The school Loudner attended kicked him out of school because he demonstrated erratic and scary tendencies. Since they determined he was too potentially dangerous to attend the school, maybe they should have reported him to MHMR or some other state agency that monitors that. IDK what the answer to this kind of problem ism but I do not feel there is any way to keep everyone safe all their natural lives.So, in this case, you need more "states-people" visting residential homes.
To evaulate their citizens on a regular basis. (cause not everyone is a criminal, and hasn't had run in with the law) - just like this guy.
He didn't go to school anymore, or to work.
I'm sure there are plenty of people that do the same, homeless people, too.
They all need a visit from the state !
Is that your solution trp ?
Or is it up to the public to report these people ?
If so, have you done your job doing so ?
I'm sure you came across some mentally challenged people in your life, be it UPS customers, or at a department/grocery store, or social events.
Do you question them if they have regular, ongoing, medical care, take their medication as ordered, and if not, do you report them ?
Furthermore, do you question if they own a gun ? Or if they still have the right to purchase one ?
Yes, I'm not sure if the USA is really that way as you described. (the state orders it).
Here, and in Germany, over 99% of all mentally ill people are first diagnosed by a physcian. Some as young as newborns, some in older years.
Every country is different, I opoligize by "making things up, that are not the facts in America" .
That's what I'm getting at. If a public university goes so far as to actually ban someone from campus for being mentally unstable and a possible danger to others, shouldn't they at the very least let local law enforcement know? Common sense says that should be a requirement, and the fact that's it's not is a problem.Can't disagree with that, however the school that he was kicked out of never reported it to anyone else. (at least from what I have heard on the news) So his name would not have appeared on the shared list. The big issue is the maintaining of a reliable data list that can be accessed.
That's what I'm getting at. If a public university goes so far as to actually ban someone from campus for being mentally unstable and a possible danger to others, shouldn't they at the very least let local law enforcement know? Common sense says that should be a requirement, and the fact that's it's not is a problem.