Nice tryI love the key word, we.
Nice tryI love the key word, we.
This is problem everywhere.To be honest i bet 50% of the drivers in my building would take that 3 day weekend, a bunch cry now if they have to work a 5 day week.
You have to watch out for guys that have nothing to lose. These are the ones that you should be respecting.Nice try
Show me the guy that has nothing to lose.You have to watch out for guys that have nothing to lose. These are the ones that you should be respecting.
How about...you read the language?
All existing regular full-time package car drivers (RPCD) shall be considered RPCD drivers for the purpose of this Section.
The number of 22.4 combination drivers shall not exceed twenty-five (25%) of the total number of RPCDs in the building.
The number of RPCDs working a Monday through Friday schedule in each building, shall be verified and agreed to by
each Local Union and the Company Labor Representative, as of August 1, 2018 and shall be protected jobs. “Protected jobs” shall
include RPCDs that will continue to be replaced by employees covered under Article 41, Section 2
I have been an active steward and a committee man both as a part timer and full timer. I am all too familiar with the workings of UPS mgmt. and the local union in our area which is a very large local and joint council area. This language is not vague; it is clear cut and not open to interpretation. The 25% is determined by the total # of RPCDs and the total # of protected jobs is based off only those current FT package car drivers that work M-friend.
No matter what is said at the union meeting; this language does not change. Unless the master is voted down.
@Benben
With all due respect;
The contract hasn't been ratified by the membership yet.
We haven't even seen the supplements yet.
All this speculation.... is just an exercise in futility.... at this point.
-Bug-
Some will see him inevitably.Show me the guy that has nothing to lose.
Some will see him inevitably.
It's not going to pass...
I still don’t understand how some on here are defending 22.4 how it’s written and on top of that denying that supplements will protect against layoffs. It’s like they are admitting that they are trying to screw people.It's not going to pass...
I hope you’re right!It's not going to pass...
Not from my vote it won't pass.I hope you’re right!
It's a bad deal.I still don’t understand how some on here are defending 22.4 how it’s written and on top of that denying that supplements will protect against layoffs. It’s like they are admitting that they are trying to screw people.
We hope...It's not going to pass...
You are in the house of No voters.We hope...
Curious as to why if one is at top rate would expect annual raises higher than the inflation rate?Hats off to the leadership! They stood firm and negotiated a whopping 2.2 percent raise! Way to get us some of those record profits!
Because we work harder and harder every year that passes?Curious as to why if one is at top rate would expect annual raises higher than the inflation rate?