I understand that we should have a postal service....I think that the USPS should only deal with letters and flats up to a certain size and weight....The parcels should be UPS work...When the postal service was begun there were only letters and flats..........USPS should be reorganized...reduce post offices and have groups of mailboxes at central locations.....I doubt that the USPS has an ie department.....
If you take a second look at the constitution you will see that it doesn’t actually say there has to be a post office. That is a common misconception. It just says that the government has the power and yada yada yada.
I am about as anti-post office as anyone but it has more to do with fairness and less to do with them taking out work. People that support them will argue about pension obligations and price controls. It’s not that simple. Plus, rampant inefficiency and waste has not only cost them millions but have resulted in poor customer service across-the-board.
They were only required to fund the pension for so many decades but chose to go out much farther than that. Another misconception is that it was Republicans that were solely responsible for the pension mandates. That is wrong as well. Feel free to look it up. It has been discussed here many times.
The price controls are a funny thing because if they were lifted, and the post office were to raise prices to try to break even, let alone become profitable, many shippers would likely leave them because most only use them for their ability to severely undercut the competition. Thank God there are still plenty but would rather pay more for better customer service. That helps us.
So, the very thing that essentially locks in a guaranteed way to undercut competition could also be the very thing that, should it be lifted, drastically reduces the amount of volume they handle.
If the post office were permitted to run like a business should they would likely have to take a look at cutting pensions and benefits. But good luck with that since it’s a government entity and we all know how difficult it is to take something away once it has been given to govt employees. Should they completely privatized you can count on everything I’ve laid out so far happening.
The bottom line here is that the government should not be competing with the private sector. It’s not fair and its not the governments role to provide low cost, or profitable for that matter, shipping rates. The purpose of the government is to do exactly what the name states. Govern.
I would agree if they only handled mail and certain parcels that are very small. The problem is that mail, which is mostly unsolicited now, is going the way of the dinosaurs. Well, not really a problem but more like something that is at the end of its life cycle and needs to be permitted to fade away.