Mattmac0912
Banned
Can almost guarantee that they didn’t really get any inoculation that they’re trying to force on others
There is a simple answer for that, the potential added votes were added in deep blue districts which have total control by the democrats. They weren't added in swing districts.
The Driver
I drive.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
He's Q.
Why wouldn't they? They are part of the brainwashed as well. They just used COVID as a political tool because they thought it was the best way to beat trump.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
It's so obvious, we didn't think that you actually didn't know the answer to that. I'm sorry you aren't up to the challenge.
The Driver
I drive.
Trump beat Trump. The idiot couldn't find a way to unite the country to fight a common enemy. Literally any other president before him would've figured out what the play was. LOL. Pathetic.
Mattmac0912
Banned
Nah I actually don’t see it that way. These are people that want to make rules for the great unwashed that they themselves have no intention of following
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
I was just clarifying that it's still a valid reason for a religious exemption.
The Driver
I drive.
So someone like Lindsey Graham, the man who falls all over himself to defend Donald Trump, didn't actually take Trump's vaccine? What's your conspiracy theory here?
I don't really want to defend trump, but he started down the path folks like you push for but COVID response almost instantly became politicized by the left. This politicization made it impossible for there to be unity. The panic mongering that was part of this still has people scared
less today when they don't need to be and has led to excess deaths from suicide, drug overdose, domestic abuse, etc. Just own it.
Non sequitur
Well-Known Member
Because the alternative is even more unbelievable. There is no way there is that many stupid people in America voting for these knuckleheads. Now I get it party loyalty and vote the party that is for the little guy, but these folks are communist dressed up as Democrats.
Browntown2014
Well-Known Member
Lol stock market has ever been higher. Sign me up for this communism then dum dum.
Mattmac0912
Banned
Pouring printed money into it will give that appearance haha
Mattmac0912
Banned
Obama’s 60th party is tonight. Looking at that massive mansion and even bigger party tent, reminds me of pre-revolution France. And then, they invented the guillotine. Let them eat stimulus !
Made brown
Well-Known Member
Wait are we still discussing the vioxx medication?
Non sequitur
Well-Known Member
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
A Pandemic of The Vaccinated - Does The Vaccine Create a Pathway For A More Dangerous Variant? - The Last Refuge
One of the more commonsense approaches to reviewing COVID-19 data, amid the outbreak of the ‘Delta variant’, is to look at the percentage of vaccinated people in a regional population, and then look at the percentage of vaccinated people in the hospital with “covid related” symptoms...
theconservativetreehouse.com
COVID-19 is not more deadly than the flu UNLESS you have taken the vaccine; then it might be more dangerous. The vaccine is ineffective at stopping severe COVID illness and, data suggests, might actually make things worse…. creating a perpetual need for continued booster modifications to counteract the initial issue.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Entrenched Principle to Not Coerce Acceptance of Unlicensed Medical Products
To be licensed, the FDA must find that a medical product is “safe for use and … effective in use.”3 Until licensed, a medical product remains investigational, even after issuance of an EUA. As the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) explains with regard to a vaccine granted EUA: “The issuance of an EUA is different than an FDA approval (licensure) of a vaccine. A vaccine available under emergency use authorization is still considered investigational.”4 And as the FDA explains, “an investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug” because these two terms are synonymous.5 For example, the EUA fact sheet for an intravenous drug to treat H1N1 granted EUA by the FDA explains that it is “an experimental drug.”6 Similarly, after an EUA was granted
for the COVID-19 vaccine co-developed by the NIH and Moderna, it was described by the NIH as an “[e]xperimental coronavirus vaccine.”7
Long settled legal precedent establishes that it is not legal to coerce an individual to accept an unlicensed, and hence experimental, medical product. An individual must voluntarily agree, free from any undue influence, to accept same. This principle was first codified long-ago by American jurists.8 It was then incorporated into the United States Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, and guidance from federal health agencies. See e.g., 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-0a (Even for patients with a life-threatening condition, an unlicensed medical product cannot be coerced, rather Congress required obtaining the patient’s “written informed consent.”) 42 U.S.C. § 9501 (Same for mental health patients);9 45 C.friend.R. § 46.116 (For an unlicensed medical product, the “Basic elements of informed consent” include that “participation is voluntary,” “refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled” and that consent be obtained without “coercion or undue influence.”);10 FDA Information Sheet: Informed Consent (“Coercion occurs when an overt threat of harm [such as expulsion from school or employment] is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance.”)11
Similar threads
