Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Did you consider my subsequent post?I thought about this and it's the same difference though. I have 10 employees working, I need 7 to complete the job. In theory, I ask the top seniority Teamster first if he/she wants the extra work. That Teamster has the right to say yes, or no.
I do this with the next person in line until I've offered the work to all 7 employees in seniority order who say yes.
When anyone is offered work first, in essence, they're also being offered to go home first, because they can say no. If they say no, they're also being allowed to leave first due to their seniority.
You're all correct about PTers with no other job going home after 2 hrs though. Did they even pay for gas at that point?
Because the contract isn't just written to benefit the union membership???
It is also written to allow the Company run their operation efficiently and safely.
With seniority, often comes experience and knowledge.
Why should the Company be saddled with having to send home the wrong person (or nobody, if it means having the wrong guy in the wrong chair) in order to satisfy a "two-way" seniority provision???
Where I will agree with you @Jones is in the notion that the Company should want to send home the senior employee if the senior employee is agreeable, for economic reason$, but should not be locked into the practice if it puts them at a disadvantage in regards to safety, service, or production.