(PMJI, as an outsider doing some homework for a column I write on data analytics.) Does ORION help at all? Judging from the general discussion about ORION hereabouts, most of it is pretty negative. My question would be roughly this: How much of it is the system itself not giving you a good route, and how much is UPS riding your b*tt and making you follow it too closely?
The column I'm working on this month is going to look at a bunch of computing/software/analytics projects like computer chess tournaments, (somewhat) self-driving cars, and... well, I wanted to mention ORION. The general conclusion is that in many of these applications, the "smartest" decisions are made not by humans or computers alone, but by humans *using* computers -- for instance, in a recent run-what-you-brung wide-open world championship chess tournament, the winner was a team of non-master players using three strong computer programs, with the humans making the final decision as to each move.
There's a huge disconnect between what I read about ORION in press releases and in the media (Forbes, WSJ, tech mags, etc.), and what you guys are saying about how it works on the ground.
When I first got a GPS, the directions it gave were pretty bad, at times. Before that, things like MapQuest and Google Maps were also not very good. The problem that ORION is trying to solve is orders of magnitude more difficult, since you have packages that have to be picked up and dropped off (some by 10:30, some not, etc.), in addition to just mapping the route.
Does the system help at all? Is it something that could be useful if you had more flexibility to use your own judgment? Is the problem just too difficult to solve in software at this point, especially given real-world things that happen (car wrecks on your route, packages not there, having to run across a 4-lane highway to get to the destination, etc., etc.)?