What is the REAL reason negotiations have stalled?

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
After seeing how poorly the part timers have been treated the last 41 years in contracts I don’t believe for a second that the Union has suddenly decided that Part Time Pay is so important that the members will strike over it. It DOES make a great news story and is good for getting Public Support to swing our way in case of a strike but what are opinions of the REAL reasons negotiations broke down? What is the real reason we may go on strike?

My opinions are the company wants to make things like attendance a Cardinal sin, and wants to make the work week for the vast majority of employees Tuesday-Saturday
That is a very good point! I’ve already seen both of those things being implemented already. Also heard rumblings of the tues-sat workweek for everybody, or most.
 

Karma...

Well-Known Member
it wasn't a ups strike .....it was a teamster strike.......central states squandered all that money.............ive been thru strikes and slow downs.....ive cash on hand for the long haul......bring it on........I dont think Biden would allow a strike...maybe a short one....
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
That is a very good point! I’ve already seen both of those things being implemented already. Also heard rumblings of the tues-sat workweek for everybody, or most.
No you haven't, fake news.

Nowhere has attendance (or anything similar) been implemented as a cardinal sin, nor is the vast majority being scheduled Tues-Sat anywhere.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
No you haven't, fake news.

Nowhere has attendance (or anything similar) been implemented as a cardinal sin, nor is the vast majority being scheduled Tues-Sat
Our whole automotive dept was split down the middle. 1/2 tues thru sat, half sun-Thurs. and they just started cracking down on attendance.
 

MrBates

Well-Known Member
I almost created a thread on this. For many, many years FTers have made it pretty clear they will not strike for PTers. Granted not all but most have said it at some point.

Now, with the IBT not allowing the contract to be voted on they'll have no choice but to support a strike for PTers pay. So with that said do FTers become vile scabs because of their own arrogance or do they stand with the PTers?

Personally I like that Obrien is not putting the decision in the members hands so that the PTers don't get walked over. Though we had something like that before called the 2/3 rule and we all saw how that worked out for that administration.
Mainstream media seems to be pushing the idea that it is about the part timers. Check out the infographic at 2:23. I've never heard of part timers averaging 9 hour days at $20/hr. News report says this is what UPS is stating.
 

Superteeth2478

Well-Known Member



I COULD NOT STOP CRINGING READING THAT "TOP 5" BULL:censored2:
If the average part-time rates across the nation are $20/hour without the MRAs I will stick my own dick up my ass.
...it's not very big so my only option will be cutting it off and sticking it in there.
 

TheOCbaby

Member
I almost created a thread on this. For many, many years FTers have made it pretty clear they will not strike for PTers. Granted not all but most have said it at some point.

Now, with the IBT not allowing the contract to be voted on they'll have no choice but to support a strike for PTers pay. So with that said do FTers become vile scabs because of their own arrogance or do they stand with the PTers?

Personally I like that Obrien is not putting the decision in the members hands so that the PTers don't get walked over. Though we had something like that before called the 2/3 rule and we all saw how that worked out for that administration.
 
Top