Spongebob1
Well-Known Member
Just an organizer, dismissed by the IBT ?
Maybe I'm wrong.
Or.... a YRC guy ?
Help me out.
-Bug-
Nope, you're wrong,
Just an organizer, dismissed by the IBT ?
Maybe I'm wrong.
Or.... a YRC guy ?
Help me out.
-Bug-
Nope, you're wrong,
The Shocking Emails Behind the H Playboy Party Scandal
Some interesting e-mails,
And I'm not tdu, never have been! I'm just fed up with corruption, and weak leadership!
Besides outright lying, what else do they have?When frustrated, the TDU supporters start calling everyone names.
Why is that ??
-Bug-
That's just dumb and so not true! The dog can't be TDU, dogs are incapable of lying and laughing. However, the big load of crap underneath the dogs ass can very well be TDU.Doesn't really matter. Anyone whose thoughts, words or actions are not in lockstep with Bug is immediately labeled TDU. If Bug's neighbor's dog barks in the middle of the night...you can be sure that mutt is TDU.
Besides outright lying, what else do they have?
The Shocking Emails Behind the H Playboy Party Scandal
Some interesting e-mails,
And I'm not tdu, never have been! I'm just fed up with corruption, and weak leadership!
Geeeeeezee, I'm still looking for tdu in those Emails,..
Can't find it, all I see is R.A, W.S, S.K and SWS,
Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?I get it, you guys don't like anyone questioning Lord H, but again, where in the Independent Review Board's report is TDU's name mentioned? I didn't see it anywhere. Or maybe you're saying TDU is part of the Board? I missed that too. But you're probably right, TDU is just mad that they couldn't tickets to The Playboy Super Bowl Party like Lord H's crew.
They don't have a brain to think. They just shoot their mouth off on the internet because they can't be held accountable. When you call them out on it they cry and report your post to have the truth removed. I don't expect this one to stay up long either but it's ok because I got their game.Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?
They don't have a brain to think. They just shoot their mouth off on the internet because they can't be held accountable. When you call them out on it they cry and report your post to have the truth removed. I don't expect this one to stay up long either but it's ok because I got their game.
They don't have a brain to think. They just shoot their mouth off on the internet because they can't be held accountable. When you call them out on it they cry and report your post to have the truth removed. I don't expect this one to stay up long either but it's ok because I got their game.
Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?
Maybe people should learn not to steal.Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?
Reread what I posted and please you your brain before responding.You're saying these are the first cases the IRB has opened since Lord H said that? It seems I've seen cases in the back of the Teamster magazine for 30 years now. I suppose TDU put those there.
If someone gets "CONVICTED", then I'll read ALL the information.Maybe people should learn not to steal.
And extort.
I don't know if TDU posted any of these (there's more cases if you want to read them) but the DOL posts them and a Google check of OLMS indictments would probably be enlightening . They're probably TDU too.
If you read the info you will read the convictions. If you don't want to read about convicted union members then "DON'T" read them.If someone gets "CONVICTED", then I'll read ALL the information.
Can you explain that statement?Reread what I posted and please you your brain before responding.
If this goes on while the light is on (while oversight exists) what will go on in the dark when it's gone?Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?
Do you do any analytical thinking? Have you noticed ever since the international said that they were going to do away with the IRB, all of a sudden there's all of these IRB cases coming through channels? do you have any clue on why that is?