Abortion

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
If men menstruated, tampons would be subsidized by the government.

If men could get pregnant, abortions would be on-demand, freely available in kiosks on every street corner.
 
F

Frankie's Friend

Guest
The hats don't represent breast cancer. Ttku.....
Screenshot_20181016-234453_Google.jpg
 
F

Frankie's Friend

Guest
If men menstruated, tampons would be subsidized by the government.

If men could get pregnant, abortions would be on-demand, freely available in kiosks on every street corner.
Is prostrate cancer surgery free now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Whitelexus

Well-Known Member
I don’t typically play into the bipartisan division but what strikes me as the most interesting stance, taken by many Republicans, is this facade of righteousness for pro-life; however, it seems when it boils down to supporting the, primarily lower socioeconomic group—whom have a substantially higher rate of teenage pregnancy, birth out of wedlock, children born with chemical dependency issues etc—Republicans seem to pull against the welfare programs that support their “pro-life” stance. Please enlighten me!
 

Whitelexus

Well-Known Member
Another problem with the pro life movement-while playing the seemingly humanitarian card, a basic rights violation of (some of) the mothers’ is foregone. What about these expectant mothers whom were raped? Incest cases? Teenage KIDS without a proper support system? You honestly believe that (with most of these cases) both/either child and mother are going to be able to, realistically, live anything above poverty-level lifestyle? Is that what pro-life affords? It doesn’t affect you, but it’s easy to make yourself feel better about calling ALL abortion cases “murder.” Gtfo Most of these pro-life supporters seem to completely disregard this reality.
 
Top