Atheism ON TOPIC

[bbsam]

No blather.
I can only be as stubborn as far as the account will let me.
Pretend theory is a waste of your time when you accept what happened.

It seems to waste more of your time arguing against it.

 

[bbsam]

The stupidity of most of the religious people in this thread has been a great promoter of atheism.

Well, it takes two...

Although there are those who would like (or think they would like) religious law, I can still Google “Barely Legal Bukkakke Babes 2019 4 Hour Compilation” and spend the next two weeks not scratching the surface of depravity.

 

[BrownFlush]

Lmao, where do your morals come from?

Not from human reason.

 

[El Correcto]

Not from human reason.

You don’t want to tell me? Where do your “moral laws” come from that are not religious as you claim, that prove homosexuality is unnatural and against these “Laws of Nature”?

 

[BrownFlush]

Lmao, where do your morals come from?

Where does your science come from that says your homosexuality is not a moral issue.

 

[vantexan]

Okay, maybe get a basic understanding of sexuality. I’m sorry you’re so ignorant on the subject.

Everything is about sex with you guys. Does love ever enter the equation?

 

[El Correcto]

Where does your science come from that says your homosexuality is not a moral issue.

I’ll freely admit it has moral issues. Mainly the lack of morals you have for condemning it out of blind faith in your stupid Jew fairy tales.

 

[floridays]

You’re proposing your faith as scientific laws of nature. There is no scientific law of stealing.

I'm proposing my own law, you and your boyfriend use all the tools in your bag, every club in your golf bag, used exclusively between yourselves and like minded gentlemen you can never attain what the law of "evolution" (it's not a law) prescribes to further itself. The same exists for creation.

Pick your "law" or pick your theory, in either instance you come up lacking.

It is an unnatural act, nature does not dictate it to further itself, evolution does not dictate it to further itself, and creation, by the creator condemns it.

It's your choice, pick your judge, evolution or a creator.

I will offer good news, the creator does offer redemption.

Evolution offers extinction, (for your type) you understand, the survival of the fittest. You're fighting against yourself in the evolutionary realm.

 

[bbsam]

Everything is about sex with you guys. Does love ever enter the equation?

Yes. For the 35 minutes leading up to the sex. Duh.

 

[BrownFlush]

You don’t want to tell me? Where do your “moral laws” come from that are not religious as you claim, that prove homosexuality is unnatural and against these “Laws of Nature”?

What?
My morals do not come from human reasoning like I stated. Look where your reasoning got you.
Again and again again...If I did not have the Bible or any religious background whatsoever..Nature itself teaches me that homosexuality is wrong.

 

[BrownFlush]

out of blind faith in your stupid Jew fairy tales.

There you go.

Nope. Just from looking out my window.

 

[bbsam]

I'm proposing my own law, you and your boyfriend use all the tools in your bag, every club in your golf bag, used exclusively between yourselves and like minded gentlemen you can never attain what the law of "evolution" (it's not a law) prescribes to further itself. The same exists for creation.

Pick your "law" or pick your theory, in either instance you come up lacking.

It is an unnatural act, nature does not dictate it to further itself, evolution does not dictate it to further itself, and creation, by the creator condemns it.

It's your choice, pick your judge, evolution or a creator.

I will offer good news, the creator does offer redemption.

Evolution offers extinction, (for your type) you understand, the survival of the fittest. You're fighting against yourself in the evolutionary realm.

Considering how long homosexuality has been around, nature and history suggest you are wrong.

 

[BrownFlush]

Considering how long homosexuality has been around, nature and history suggest you are wrong.

Everyone knows if something has been around for a long time, well, that makes it right. smh

 

[El Correcto]

I'm proposing my own law, you and your boyfriend use all the tools in your bag, every club in your golf bag, used exclusively between yourselves and like minded gentlemen you can never attain what the law of "evolution" (it's not a law) prescribes to further itself. The same exists for creation.

Pick your "law" or pick your theory, in either instance you come up lacking.

It is an unnatural act, nature does not dictate it to further itself, evolution does not dictate it to further itself, and creation, by the creator condemns it.

It's your choice, pick your judge, evolution or a creator.

I will offer good news, the creator does offer redemption.

Evolution offers extinction, (for your type) you understand, the survival of the fittest. You're fighting against yourself in the evolutionary realm.

Evolution doesn’t have an agenda friend, it doesn’t “pick or choose” like a god. It is just the observation of what occurs naturally in species, how things evolve.

 

[floridays]

Well your own argument argues against you. For eons man has found all kinds of different places to “spill his seed”.

Face, breasts, oral, anal, just about any domesticated animal, the “belly of a whore”....

Fact is, most sex has to do with pleasure, not procreation. It’s a wonder (if not a tragedy) that the human species continues on at all.

Understood, my point was not exclusive to his situation.
In finality, for the human race to continue it takes a man and woman, not two men and a sheep or goat.

Sheep, goat penis made for mrs. sheep, and so forth, the initial, and I think I used that word, possibly in a different post though, purpose is procreation.

 

[BrownFlush]

Evolution doesn’t have an agenda friend, it doesn’t “pick or choose” like a god. It is just the observation of what occurs naturally in species, how things evolve.

You know, like, something that has never been actually observed.

 

[bbsam]

Everyone knows if something has been around for a log time, well, that makes it right. smh

Maybe you should read what floridays wrote to get context. He wasn’t discussing right and wrong. He was saying that it was “unnatural” and would lead to “extinction”.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Well your own argument argues against you. For eons man has found all kinds of different places to “spill his seed”.

Face, breasts, oral, anal, just about any domesticated animal, the “belly of a whore”....

Fact is, most sex has to do with pleasure, not procreation. It’s a wonder (if not a tragedy) that the human species continues on at all.

That's so 1960's melodrama!
I always suspected you are a hippie in suppression.

 

[BrownFlush]

Maybe you should read what floridays wrote to get context. He wasn’t discussing right and wrong. He was saying that it was “unnatural” and would lead to “extinction”.

Probably could inject the argument there that if homosexuals are born and have no choice, they would be extinct .

 

[bbsam]

That's so 1960's melodrama!
I always suspected you are a hippie in suppression.

Actually, in my mind I imagine John Cleese delivering that line in Monty Pythons “The Meaning of Life”.