FeederDriverIL
Your ≠ You're
Those are some good lyrics for a song, Tiny Parcels on the ground! Lazy loaders all around! I’m gonna file a copyright
Those are some good lyrics for a song, Tiny Parcels on the ground! Lazy loaders all around! I’m gonna file a copyright
Yep, I've had that option on one of my clerking programs for months now. I know they are testing it, just waiting for it to roll out in my hub.RFID pal labels are coming. they will know every package where is it at any given time.
RFID pal labels are coming. they will know every package where is it at any given time.
They are definitely coming, a couple of buildings in my local already have them.I’ve heard that for at least 20 years
Will believe it when I see it
That would make sense because it was the smaller buildings around here that got them as well.I heard there is a shortage of supplies for the RFID machines and tags, so only the smaller buildings are getting them around here for the time being.
We have it.I’ve heard that for at least 20 years
Will believe it when I see it
Does this go for unreported accidents? Being it's part of a procedure.How are you guys interpreting this? We have been debating it....
View attachment 440803
To some of us its a running sentance so ALL the things listed DO NOT count as dishonesty and we CAN NOT be fired for them. So it's to our favor. Other drivers think the exact opposite and think now we can be fired for not following the methods.
Why would this be something to complain about?View attachment 440804
If you want to complain about something in the Central, people should complain about this change from "Shall" to "attemp to"
Does this go for unreported accidents? Being it's part of a procedure.
I interpret it as there have been problems with supervisors firing guys for dishonesty when it should be about failure to follow methods warning letters. Happens everywhere from what I read on here. Glad to see they attacked the problem.How are you guys interpreting this? We have been debating it....
View attachment 440803
To some of us its a running sentance so ALL the things listed DO NOT count as dishonesty and we CAN NOT be fired for them. So it's to our favor. Other drivers think the exact opposite and think now we can be fired for not following the methods.
You need to worry more about your fantasy football team and less and "wording " PoindexterWhy would this be something to complain about?
Prior to this change, only the Union was required (shall) to make themselves available in 10 days upon request, with no onus on the Company to do the same.
As written now the language is equitable for all parties
seems to me that most of you dudes are of the younger generation and embrace the enlightened, woke and entitled mantras that your generation has heartily swallowed..
I like how management can do this and not get into any trouble it almost seems like a lawsuit is possible.I interpret it as there have been problems with supervisors firing guys for dishonesty when it should be about failure to follow methods warning letters. Happens everywhere from what I read on here. Glad to see they attacked the problem.
Any hourly that owns stock is just as much an owner as management. Not the same as it was before UPS went public.the reason is that management are the owners and rightly so...there are management and then there are peons......make your decision and live with it....
the reason is that management are the owners and rightly so...there are management and then there are peons......make your decision and live with it....