DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
That's funny, even your link from a child mutilation center lists negative effects and admits they have no idea if they will have long term effects.
Christianity
- Thread starter El Correcto
- Start date
El Correcto
god is dead
Yes there are side effects from medication but try reading what they say a bit closer, no wait I’ve lost faith in you let me grab it for you.
“Puberty blockers do not cause permanent changes to the body. And you can stop taking them at any time.
If you decide to stop taking puberty blockers and did not take hormone therapy, your body will go back to the puberty that had already started.”
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
And then they go on to admit they don't know if that's true and start using words like may and should. It's double speak, which is typical for these nutcases.
Meanwhile the NHS by changing their guidance has admitted they don't know if the effects of chemically castrating young children is reversible....
Puberty Blockers
GONE is the claim that puberty blockers are considered to be fully reversible:NEW is the admission that long-term effects are unknown:
"Little is known", but go ahead and abuse your child.
El Correcto
god is dead
It’s not chemical castration bud, I know this might be shocking for you Cletus so bear with me. Drugs can have multiple applications and uses for a variety of conditions. You are on the same level of honesty as the leftists you so hate when they said people were taking horse dewormer and drinking fish bowl cleaner.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You're deflecting again hun
El Correcto
god is dead
Sorry you are ill informed try reading that link again, it cover fertility
“Fertility
Taking puberty blockers alone should not affect your ability to have a baby in the future. However, taking estrogen or testosterone can affect it. Talk with your doctor about your options for having a baby in the future, before you start taking any medication.”
I know its not full of racist memes so I’ll try to help you understand it as best I can. Let me know if you have any other questions.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
El Correcto
god is dead
Well there could be an adverse reaction to any medication. Saying it shouldn’t doesn’t imply a lack of knowledge it implies that it, well, it shouldn’t.
El Correcto
god is dead
Are puberty blockers reversible? The NHS no longer says so
The NHS has made some welcome updates to its web page on gender dysphoria and no longer claims that puberty blockers are 'reversible'.
www.transgendertrend.com
Hey I found your source Cletus.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Yes I literally copied it from a previously posted link in this thread that you ignored because it doesn't fit your agenda.Are puberty blockers reversible? The NHS no longer says so
The NHS has made some welcome updates to its web page on gender dysphoria and no longer claims that puberty blockers are 'reversible'.
Hey I found your source Cletus.
It's the NHS's own words.
El Correcto
god is dead
I don’t ignore things that don’t fit my agenda.
I’m learning all about her and her site right now and not from partisan leftists I’m watching a Jordan Peterson interview with her.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Thank God, some people are a genetic dead ends And can’t have kids. Sometimes God truly is merciful.
FromOffTheStreets
Well-Known Member
So you agree that the commands in Bible are good?Do you think those rules came from your Bible or that your Bible maybe came after those rules?
Do you picture that is what the world was like before Moses? Or maybe Egyptians, Syrians, Babylonians, all had their own systems of law, government and morality? Maybe the Greeks had long established some form of civil society?
Linear B - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I don’t believe there is a creator and I certainly don’t believe the Bible is guiding you back to it.
Don't steal, don't murder, don't lie, don't worship yourself, love your neighbor.
You just think that other societies created these ideas first, even though we have no evidence of that. Yet we do have evidence in the Bible but you disregard it because you hate the God behind it.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You're welcome to dig into the ownership of the website that posted the actual wording change from the NHS if you like.
It's irrelevant, but if that's how you want to deflect from the facts, have fun I guess.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
"...I work as a paramedic. When somebody goes into full arrest and we treat them, we use wave form capnography to determine if we get return. What WC does is verify that oxygen is being converted into carbon dioxide through “cellular metabolism”. If we get a CO2 reading, they have been resuscitated. If “cellular metabolism” determines life or death in an adult cardiac arrest victim, it determines life all together. When does “cellular metabolism” start? Conception."
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
The Bible is full of contradictions and instructions that are either nonsense, or outright dumb. Please mention some of the numerous passages that say it's OK to have incest, that eating certain foods will send you down below, or that planting 2 different crops together should result in your death. There are hundreds of them. And this is your resource for living a righteous life?
El Correcto
god is dead
Although the 57 laws of the code were issued under the king's name, it is possible they were actually published by his son, Shulgi, after Ur-Nammu's death. The code was further developed by Shulgi's successors and influenced the form and underlying vision of later codes such as the Laws of Eshnunna (c. 1930 BCE) and the laws decreed under the reign of Lipit-Ishtar (c. 1870 to c. 1860 BCE). These codes, in turn, served as a model for the Code of Hammurabi, which would influence the laws of other civilizations, notably the creation of the Mosaic Law of the Bible.
Code of Ur-Nammu
The Code of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100-2050 BCE) is the oldest extant law code in the world. It was written by the Sumerian king Ur-Nammu (r. 2047-2030 BCE) or his son Shulgi of Ur (r. 2029-1982 BCE) centuries...
www.worldhistory.org
El Correcto
god is dead
I don’t disregard biblical evidence because I hate god. I disregard biblical evidence because it isn’t a reliable source of factual information.
FromOffTheStreets
Well-Known Member
What university did you get you Bible doctorate degree at?
Just as you ridicule the "YouTube scientists" we can also ridicule the YouTube Bible scholars, right?
Your words show that you didn't get out of preschool biblically, don't act like your a Bible professor
FromOffTheStreets
Well-Known Member
Thanks for posting that, I like theoretical history.Although the 57 laws of the code were issued under the king's name, it is possible they were actually published by his son, Shulgi, after Ur-Nammu's death. The code was further developed by Shulgi's successors and influenced the form and underlying vision of later codes such as the Laws of Eshnunna (c. 1930 BCE) and the laws decreed under the reign of Lipit-Ishtar (c. 1870 to c. 1860 BCE). These codes, in turn, served as a model for the Code of Hammurabi, which would influence the laws of other civilizations, notably the creation of the Mosaic Law of the Bible.
Code of Ur-Nammu
The Code of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100-2050 BCE) is the oldest extant law code in the world. It was written by the Sumerian king Ur-Nammu (r. 2047-2030 BCE) or his son Shulgi of Ur (r. 2029-1982 BCE) centuries...
What makes this chiseled rock reliable? If this rock was against LGBT would it still be reliable?
Back to an earlier question & I'll leave out the lying & stealing. If God promoted you to have sex with anyone anywhere, would you serve that God?
