ralph nader radio hour begs to differ
climate catastrophe
- Thread starter rickyb
- Start date
Shocking.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
you shouldve listened to the native and adopted their way of life which wasnt based on greed
now we are almost
edWho's stopping you from getting a horse and moving into a teepee? You can chop your own wood and tell stories by the fire about the Great Father Nader. Absolutely nothing is stopping you from doing so.you shouldve listened to the native and adopted their way of life which wasnt based on greed
now we are almost
we have to stop capitalism, thats what we gotta stop.
capitalism is going down and its up to us whether we let it take us down with it!
i think the natives economy actually worked
Then by all means go commune with nature. Nothing is stopping you.
yes and we will rebel against capitalism which is a system of death
Why would you need to? You're out on the pristine prairie chasing buffalo then retreating to your roaring campfire to play shadow puppets before retiring for the night. You don't have a care in the world. Everything is better there so why aren't you doing it already?
because its like 9/11 - the chickens come home to roost eventually even if you got your head stuck in the sand as you are encouraging
You're the one saying we'd all be better off if we lived like Native Americans. So put your money where your mouth is. And while out there try considering what it would take for all of us, hundreds of millions of us, to live like they did before capitalism. Consider hundreds of millions of people hunting every day for food. Cutting firewood with stone implements. Hauling drinking water. Waste removal.
The reason we have capitalism is markets seek to be as efficient as possible for as large a profit as possible. To provide goods and services people want that will improve their lives and they're willing to pay for. That's how you house, feed, clothe, and transport that many people.
Now come back at me with you're usual nonsensical BS. You are naive, immature, and ignorant. And you enable people like Nader to enrich themselves feeding your delusions.
markets dont seek to be efficient - we ship goods thousands of miles; thats not efficient.
we have a throw away consumer culture - thats not efficient
most things we own sit unused most of hte time - thats not efficient
get off the crack pipeee
im also saying we need to stop out of control capitalism
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Maybe the native Indians chickens came home to roost?
This 9/11???
THERMITE used in 9/11? Absolute proof...
THERMITE used in 9/11? Absolute proof... 👉 https://noahreport.com
rumble.com
We MASS ship items. Again, I said the markets seek to be the most efficient FOR THE MOST PROFIT. It's cheaper to ship from China for example because the labor costs are much cheaper. Thus shipping from that distance is the most cost effective. Furthermore in the U.S. we ship in bulk our food by truck and rail. Can you grow wheat in substantial amounts in Georgia? Much better to grow it in Kansas and ship it to manufacturing plants all over to process into food.
You don't understand what has already been figured out long ago. You think that markets are purposely being inefficient for some evil reason. But the truth is no matter the product producers want to make it for as little as possible so that they can keep more of what they charge for themselves. They aren't intentionally throwing money away.
Now come back with more nonsensical wisdom on how you think everything ought to work when you don't demonstrate any knowledge of how things actually work and why they are done that way.
Just be honest. You want to herd everyone into cities where they'll all use buses and subways that are electrified by wind and solar. The food we eat will be from huge government farms using fully automated electric machines. We'll be told what we can eat as in bugs, not meat. What we can wear. What words we are allowed to use. With everyone having equal outcomes from equal incomes. Having more is evil unless you've proven your value to the state.
shipping long distances might be profitable (only because cost of pollution not actually factored in) but its definitely not efficient.
CIA calls it blowback. you blow up the world and ruin democracies, and people want revenge.This 9/11???
THERMITE used in 9/11? Absolute proof...
THERMITE used in 9/11? Absolute proof... 👉 https://noahreport.com
It's the most efficient way to maintain profits. Markets don't choose to operate at a loss. Soon out of business that way.
profits and efficiency are not the same thing
Who said they were? But you operate as efficiently as possible to make bigger profits. Your extreme efficiency won't work because no one would do it if it cost them too much to operate that way.
And personal cars that sit most of the time? Those personal cars provide jobs to people. Manufacturing, car dealers, gas production, gas distribution, car repair, parts suppliers, aftermarket products like stereos, window tinting, etc. The list is endless. You'd put a lot of people out of working herding everyone onto public transportation. But it's efficient!
Similar threads
