MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
You have to be 21 to by weed. Ttku
Continuing Reagan’s failed War on Drugs.
- Thread starter El Correcto
- Start date
floridays
Well-Known Member
Alcohol also, we know how that works correct?
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Exactly. Now you get it.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Easier for teenagers to get weed than alcohol in areas that have prohibition of cannabis. If protecting children is the goal, legalization and regulation would help.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Gotten it all along. This post was answered by you, after you said you've wasted too much time reading my posts. Keep your word holmes.Exactly. Now you get it.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
Did the teen usage rate go up or down after legalization?
According to IWBF all drugs should be available, people should just do what they want. And teenagers have had those of legal age buy for them forever.
Still higher than the national average. Surely something to be proud of.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Exactly. So what have we learned from this? Where there is a will, there is a way. Keeping weed illegal does nothing to stop kids from getting high. You may not truly understand just how common and easy it is for kids to get weed. The stuff literally grows anywhere and there is an abundant supply, unlike hard drugs.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
Nice to see you being blatantly dishonest. Your current claim is all about the children and you want fewer children using drugs. When presented with evidence that legalization accomplishes this you find something else to hang on to. If you don't want to acknowledge solutions that work to accomplish the goals you claim to be seeking why debate?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
It's called freedom.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
That's not something Repugs or Dims believe in.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Except the kids that are afraid of getting busted, and I promise you the
that a kid might grow in his dads yard isn't the same he's gonna buy. Did you grow in your yard, of course not, fear of being busted, some kids won't use for the fear of being busted.
floridays
Well-Known Member
That is if anyone stipulates your facts are true, you inconveniently leave previous years decline in usage out also. If the numbers can be believed in the first place.
I have 2 questions:
1 Who rats themselves out on illegal activity?
2 Have the authorities dealt differently in reporting or charging since legalization?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You know someone has lost the argument when they resort to the "won't someone think of the children" cliche. It's the last resort of a failed stance on everything.
floridays
Well-Known Member
No, a RED X with no corresponding response is the last resort, or labeling someone as a troll, as IWBF has because they can't counter an argument beyond a couple of posts. I will take on dissenting opinions, questions, and degrading posts from anyone and not hide. Do you FIDO, @It will be fine , and @MAKAVELI understand that? If you are chicken
, be chicken. Sorry Van for getting in front of you to respond to red x super hero. Pussywillows are becoming abundant in this place.
newfie
Well-Known Member
you tried to make the point that legalizing is somehow better. How is it better when usage and addiction went up in your example. hope that helps.
newfie
Well-Known Member
brother you're way out there on this one. once an addict you are an addict for life.
Similar threads
