Sportello
Well-Known Member
Have you paid your back taxes yet?Maybe more time on grammar?
Have you paid your back taxes yet?Maybe more time on grammar?
Your hippie commie overlords count me as vaccinated
I got an exemption because I use proper grammar. Amazing how that works.Have you paid your back taxes yet?
I suggest you avoid voice to text. It makes mistakes, sometimes.I got an exemption because I use proper grammar. Amazing how that works.
Talk lower.I suggest you avoid voice to text. It makes mistakes, sometimes.
This year, i just check the box that said "personal convictions". Havent heard anything from the school district.What is your answer to the public school argument?
No shot record, no kindergarten.
That is an assumption, not proven fact.as is the case for viral replication, it requires a concentration that is not achievable by oral dosing.
quack quack QUACKURGENT: Pfizer failed to report six deaths of Covid vaccine recipients when it updated its clinical trial results in July
I am reupping this piece and making it available for everyone in the widest and simplest form because it is too important to miss. The one-parag…alexberenson.substack.com
There are a lot of things not a proven fact about ivermectin except it's great for parasites.That is an assumption, not proven fact.
You posted a lie.There are a lot of things not a proven fact about ivermectin except it's great for parasites.
You have anything besides the statement or
did you make this assumption because it goes against what you've been preaching?
I copied and pasted the post directly from the article.You posted a lie.
I'm not saying you did it on purpose.
I was simply correcting your mistake.
It's in the article you posted buddy. You're just not capable of recognizing their failed logic.I copied and pasted the post directly from the article.
So you have nothing to back that it's an assumption?
These shills are where you get your information?
I seen it, pal. Interesting.The logic tough, is as complete as the studies will allow. That's different from failed.It's in the article you posted buddy. You're just not capable of recognizing their failed logic.
It says ivermectin is a protease inhibitor.
It says Pfizer's new drug is a protease inhibitor.
It says in order for both of those protease inhibitors to be effective, too high of a dosage is required, because absorbtion is inadequate.
It goes on to say that Pfizer's protease inhibitor works because they combined it with one of their other drugs that helps it reach cells for absorbtion.
But they fail to mention the fact that the doctors prescribing ivermectin are also prescribing it in combination with another drug, quercetin, which is an iophonore that helps it be absorbed by cells.
They are using incomplete logic.
It's all in there buddy.
There is actual real world evidence it worked in India.I seen it, pal. Interesting.The logic tough, is as complete as the studies will allow. That's different from failed.
The few doctors that are prescribing ivermectin are doing it based on studies that have yielded little evidence of effectiveness. Some of the studies were halted due to lack of benefit along the way. Others have been retracted.
There is still little or no proof that ivermectin works against COVID-19.
On the other hand....
No thanks on India.There is actual real world evidence it worked in India.
Why are you even so obsessed with this?
You bring it up a lot.No obsession.