Obama spoke to the AIPAC group today to a standing ovation crowd. Over and over his ideas were embraced and welcomed with applause.
He clarifies that he was "misrepresented" by fox and the right wing and he punked both of them out.
I wish he would do more of that. Slap fox news everytime it misrepresents something, or blast right wing radio for flat out distortions.
Its no wonder the republicans dont like the "fairness doctrine" in broadcasting. It would make them out to be nothing more than anal portholes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
The
Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of
broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission's view, honest, equitable and balanced. The
1949 Commission Report served as the foundation for the Fairness Doctrine since it had previously established two more forms of regulation onto broadcasters. These two duties were to provide adequate coverage to public issues and that coverage must be fair in reflecting opposing views.
[1] The Fairness Doctrine should not be confused with the
Equal Time rule. The Fairness Doctrine deals with discussion of controversial issues, while the Equal Time rule deals only with political candidates. The Fairness Doctrine imposed two rules for broadcasters: First it required broadcasters to provide controversial news and public affairs, and it required broadcasters to provide reasonable opportunities for the presentation of contrasting view points. The second rule required contingent access obligations on broadcasters to provide reply time to issue oriented citizens and editorialized on public issues. Broadcasters could trigger fairness Doctrine complaints without editorializing. Spectrum scarcity was the doctrines reason for being made. Because more people wanted to broadcast than available frequencies could accommodate, broadcasters’ public trustee obligations required regulatory clarification, the FCC reasoned. The commission required neither of the Fairness Doctrine’s obligations before 1949. Until then broadcasters had to satisfy only general “public interest” standards of the Communications Act.
[2]
In 1969, the
United States Supreme Court upheld the Commission's general
right to enforce the Fairness Doctrine where channels were limited, but the courts have not, in general, ruled that the FCC is
obliged to do so.
[3] In 1987, the FCC abolished the Fairness Doctrine, prompting some to urge its reintroduction through either Commission policy or Congressional legislation.
[4] Following the 1969
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission decision, which provided the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with more regulatory power, the main agenda for this doctrine was to ensure that the viewers were exposed to a diversity of viewpoints.
Peace,