want to see angry. wait till you see Romney's plan to lower the deficit, fund health care(which the republicans will stall) and lower taxes. restrict or eliminate bargaining rights of labor unions, restructure and negotiate pension plans, freeze wages. sell social security to wall street, cut college funding. gotta repay all those millions donated to the party by corporate billionaires. big business has no interest in workers rights or wage increase. good fit, neither do the republican politicians. you voted republican? what were you thinking! the democtratic politicians left Wisconsin state lines to stop republicans from taking away union bargaining rights. what did the republicans do? copied the practice in more states. when they say dumb down its assumed we started smart
Elections
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
island1fox
Well-Known Member
Time to vote ---time for debate is OVAH !!
wkmac
Well-Known Member
At 7:01 pm tonight, the debate will renew. For 2014' and even 2016'. Just watch regardless of outcome.
With the rise of Republican voter intimidation, it is a welcome sight for the locals. From the article:
One voter who didn't mind Jackson's presence was Robin Spriggs, 50.
"We need it," she said. "It doesn't matter the color, the creed or anything like that. They protect everyone."
Make it easier for all to vote, and they wouldn't be needed. Why are there lines and machine 'malfunctions' at predominately Democratic polling sites, and not at Republican? We won the right for all citizens to vote over 60 years ago, and yet is is increasingly hard for many to exercise that right.
I saw Mittens vote today. He lives in a small town and there were at least a dozen unused machines. Why weren't they in Roxbury where they are needed?
One voter who didn't mind Jackson's presence was Robin Spriggs, 50.
"We need it," she said. "It doesn't matter the color, the creed or anything like that. They protect everyone."
Make it easier for all to vote, and they wouldn't be needed. Why are there lines and machine 'malfunctions' at predominately Democratic polling sites, and not at Republican? We won the right for all citizens to vote over 60 years ago, and yet is is increasingly hard for many to exercise that right.
I saw Mittens vote today. He lives in a small town and there were at least a dozen unused machines. Why weren't they in Roxbury where they are needed?
Seems to me they had clubs last election. Who are they protecting again???
Do they have clubs now? Did they attack anyone then?
I see guys with guns everywhere I go in an open carry state. Is it something about the look about them you object to? I don't like police cars cruising my voter line real slow, acting like they are taking names, but I guess it's legal.
UPS Lifer
Well-Known Member
To all the loons out there.... There is FOX News and then there is the rest. FOX will continue to grow until it completely over shadows the loon media on every network. You can take that to the bank .... loons
Benghazi is the beginning of the end for the loon media....
Thats NOT what he said.
David Axelrod Will Shave Off His Mustache If Obama Loses Any Of These Three States… | Mediaite
Cmon more, the election is over, the spin should stop there. You had a year of cut and paste and you lost.
Axelrod looks like a genious compared to anyone in the GOP right now, give him his credit.
Peace
TOS
moreluck
golden ticket member
Czeck Republic newspaper
Bullseye Quote:
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
Bullseye Quote:
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
Babagounj
Strength through joy
[h=3]Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow "30%" Above Gov't Numbers[/h]Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Mr. Obama received "astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received "over 99%" of the vote.
Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.
Is it odd that a county that expelled GOP inspectors and had people openly campaigning for Obama ended with 99.5% for Obama and 9955 votes for him? It's up to you to decide.
Another problem: "Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures." In these precincts it was well over 90% according to House Speaker Sam Smith of Pennsylvania. Considering all of the other "coincidences" going on, it doesn't seem kosher.
Clear fraud, odd percentages, and numbers that don't add up? Congratulations on your re-election, Mr. Obama.
Update: Obama also won 99.8% of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts.
Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.
Is it odd that a county that expelled GOP inspectors and had people openly campaigning for Obama ended with 99.5% for Obama and 9955 votes for him? It's up to you to decide.
Another problem: "Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures." In these precincts it was well over 90% according to House Speaker Sam Smith of Pennsylvania. Considering all of the other "coincidences" going on, it doesn't seem kosher.
Clear fraud, odd percentages, and numbers that don't add up? Congratulations on your re-election, Mr. Obama.
Update: Obama also won 99.8% of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts.
Sounds like a winning strategy! Lets call it even since bush stole the election in 2000 with "rigged" voting machines, eh?
peace
TOS
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Obama did not win a single state that requires photo IDs to vote, although he was victorious in four states that require non-photo identification – Washington, Colorado, Ohio and Virginia. Those states accept as legitimate identification current utility bills, bank statements and paychecks.
Obama won several closely contested states that do not require any voter identification, including Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nevada.
The states that Obama lost that do require photo identification do not traditionally vote Republican.
In Colorado, where non-photo identification is accepted, a review by RedState.com showed irregular voting patterns, finding that 10 counties had a total registration ranging between 104 to 140 percent of the respective populations.
RedState notes records show some of the counties in question maintained statistically unusual voting figures. Gilpin County had a 61 percent voter turnout in the 2010 election, and Hinsdale County had an astounding 92 percent voter turnout. Those figures are far above the Colorado average turnout of 48 percent and the national average of 41 percent.
Did this dirty trick get Obama re-elected?
Obama won several closely contested states that do not require any voter identification, including Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nevada.
The states that Obama lost that do require photo identification do not traditionally vote Republican.
In Colorado, where non-photo identification is accepted, a review by RedState.com showed irregular voting patterns, finding that 10 counties had a total registration ranging between 104 to 140 percent of the respective populations.
RedState notes records show some of the counties in question maintained statistically unusual voting figures. Gilpin County had a 61 percent voter turnout in the 2010 election, and Hinsdale County had an astounding 92 percent voter turnout. Those figures are far above the Colorado average turnout of 48 percent and the national average of 41 percent.
Did this dirty trick get Obama re-elected?
DS
Fenderbender
I think it was Minnesota, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Still hearing only what you want to here?
Similar threads
