Global warming

[av8torntn]

As compared to people who are convinced global warming exists and refuse to accept any evidence to the contrary? And something being taught to elementary children does not make it true.

Don't you find it interesting that their standard dropped from scientific proof to elementary school teachers in just a few short weeks?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

As compared to people who are convinced global warming exists and refuse to accept any evidence to the contrary? And something being taught to elementary children does not make it true.

Totally agree. Politicizing climate change is bad for everyone.
I'm not saying that because it's taught to children it's true, but the result is the same either way. Technology is taking us in the direction of renewable energy and energy conservation.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Great news!! In the seventies every elementary child knew about the coming ice age.

It is great news!! Those children have developed a lot of great technology, good for us and the environment.

 

[av8torntn]

It is great news!! Those children have developed a lot of great technology, good for us and the environment.

So you agree that even if the elementary school teachers teach things that are untrue and you can still overcome that and be productive? You brought it up so Im curious why although I assume you have no logical reason and I'll regret wasting my time asking.

It is more than a little funny that in a mere few weeks you guys have dropped to this level.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

So you agree that even if the elementary school teachers teach things that are untrue and you can still overcome that and be productive? You brought it up so Im curious why although I assume you have no logical reason and I'll regret wasting my time asking.

It is more than a little funny that in a mere few weeks you guys have dropped to this level.

Who is "you guys"?
You're arguing about politics and I'm talking about technology and renewable energy.

 

[av8torntn]

Who is "you guys"?
You're arguing about politics and I'm talking about technology and renewable energy.

You claimed even elementary students know it's true? What is the logic behind that statement? Why are you attempting to shift focus off your statement?

 

[av8torntn]

You also made a strange assertion that because children were made to believe that they were going to freeze to death that this led to some technological discovery or innovation and I also find that to be a disturbing.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You also made a strange assertion that because children were made to believe that they were going to freeze to death that this led to some technological discovery or innovation and I also find that to be a disturbing.

You are hopeless.
Let me step back and tell you what I really think. When baby boomers die off this country will be a lot better off. End of conversation.

 

[av8torntn]

You are hopeless.
Let me step back and tell you what I really think. When baby boomers die off this country will be a lot better off. End of conversation.

I may or may not be hopeless but you are one disturbed individual.

 

[av8torntn]

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/sep/10/global-carbon-trading-system

 

[av8torntn]

http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/04/carbon-trading

 

[roadrunner2012]

Don't you find it interesting that their standard dropped from scientific proof to elementary school teachers in just a few short weeks?

I believe you were the one who mistakenly used an elementary school outline in lieu of scientific proof in post#797.

When all someone can reference to is Watts and Goddard, science doesn't matter.

 

[roadrunner2012]

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/sep/10/global-carbon-trading-system

What is your point? Screw the poor?

 

[roadrunner2012]

How about posting something a bit more recent if you want to shift to economics?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/25/us-china-carbon-idUSBRE9AO07E20131125

 

[av8torntn]

I believe you were the one who mistakenly used an elementary school outline in lieu of scientific proof in post#797.

When all someone can reference to is Watts and Goddard, science doesn't matter.

That's an ignorant statement.

 

[av8torntn]

What is your point? Screw the poor?

That's what you took from that? Amazing

 

[av8torntn]

How about posting something a bit more recent if you want to shift to economics?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/25/us-china-carbon-idUSBRE9AO07E20131125

By your definition that would be an old news story.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL3N0KK0UX20140121?irpc=932

 

[av8torntn]

I believe you were the one who mistakenly used an elementary school outline in lieu of scientific proof in post#797.

.

Explain what you see as the mistake.

 

[roadrunner2012]

Explain what you see as the mistake.

Here's the thing, the author was using simple scientific experiments to show how climate change works.

 

[av8torntn]

Here's the thing, the author was using simple scientific experiments to show how climate change works.

Here's the thing. It was the most basic explanation of a topic and still miles over your head.