Might want to recheck this today. All three Detroit auto manufacturers posted huge numbers in June. Of course, once again, the facts don't fit the author's narrative.
Might want to recheck this today. All three Detroit auto manufacturers posted huge numbers in June. Of course, once again, the facts don't fit the author's narrative.
He wrote the article Monday. Tuesday just looks alot different. I don't know why you think we have to break even by a given date. The US government is in a position to "buy and hold".The market was open half day today. GM was up $1.10 at $20.67. How does this make the author a liar? GM stock is still not worth what it was. The shares would have to hit $53 for the shareholders (us) to break even. How is this a lie??
You say US gov't like it's their money. It's our money and if the car people are making so much, why haven't they paid us the money back???He wrote the article Monday. Tuesday just looks alot different. I don't know why you think we have to break even by a given date. The US government is in a position to "buy and hold".
He wrote the article Monday. Tuesday just looks alot different. I don't know why you think we have to break even by a given date. The US government is in a position to "buy and hold".
Stock prices don't always follow increased revenue. If the general attitude of the market is sour, like continued bad economic policies from Washington, they will sell more stock than buy and thus the price drops.
Tos , what was the last GREAT AMERICAN CAR built within the USA of only MADE IN THE USA parts ?
And yet way better than expected sales coupled with higher stock prices suggest that the policies in Washington matter more to you political argument than they do to the market.
Where do you get the higher stock crap??? It was $53 and now $26 (?) In Catholic school they told us 26 was lower than 53. Maybe the progressive schools taught it diferently.And yet way better than expected sales coupled with higher stock prices suggest that the policies in Washington matter more to you political argument than they do to the market.
I don't care if gm made the taxpayers a billion dollars it was the wrong move
Right, cause you would have preferred to have a million people out of work and your taxes increased to pay for them while they sat on unemployment.
Peace
TOS
Gm only employs around 170k people in the U.S. so it wouldn't be a million unemployed. Besides, throw that on top of the several million more people who became unemployed since Obama has been in office and it wouldn't make much of a difference.
You know, I seen them interviewing a few hardcore republicans that have retired from GM.
They aren't happy at all with Obama, because part of the GM bail-out package was reducing their pensions by 40%.
Too bad Romney wasn't in charge back then - they would be getting NOTHING in GM pensions !
What about all the suppliers that woul go under?