It will be fine
Well-Known Member
Complaining because people call the cops when they hear gunfire in their backyard. I can’t imagine why.You sound like a trouble maker.
Complaining because people call the cops when they hear gunfire in their backyard. I can’t imagine why.You sound like a trouble maker.
Ironically, the people next door (Actually 1/2 mile away) are doing their normal Sunday shooting today.Complaining because people call the cops when they hear gunfire in their backyard. I can’t imagine why.
You know the LibTurds on here don't understand the logic in that meme.
Here's an idea. Go to a shooting range.My problem is which way is the wind blowing? West winds go offshore, South winds go back towards my town, North winds head out to the shipping channels, and east winds goes towards a 3 mile long state beach.
Riiiight, and I bet you believe we put a man on the moon and those chemical trails the military leaves in the sky are harmless....Speed of sound is at least 760 MPH. Much faster than any prevailing winds on earth.
That would be additional time and expense? ... nah! He's got this.Here's an idea. Go to a shooting range.
I could agree if he was on his own property. But he wasn't.That would be additional time and expense? ... nah! He's got this.
I don’t think anyone could claim John Paul Stevens was ignorant or lying in his dissent in Heller, but good on you for sowing division in the country!
Stevens didn’t dispute what the Second Amendment stated. He supported its outright repeal.I don’t think anyone could claim John Paul Stevens was ignorant or lying in his dissent in Heller, but good on you for sowing division in the country!
I've been reading his twisted dissent, weak sister IWBF always resorts to this dissent, it's actually disjointed and sophistry.Stevens didn’t dispute what the Second Amendment stated. He supported its outright repeal.
But you keep twisting away, okay?
What are you talking about? You never read his dissent, did you? He writes that the second amendment refers to a well regulated militia and that was its purpose. The founders never wanted the federal government to maintain a standing army, they expected States to maintain militias for defense. Why do you hate state’s rights?Stevens didn’t dispute what the Second Amendment stated. He supported its outright repeal.
But you keep twisting away, okay?
You have exactly no idea what you think you are talking about, I'd be glad to argue, point by point if you'd like.What are you talking about? You never read his dissent, did you? He writes that the second amendment refers to a well regulated militia and that was its purpose. The founders never wanted the federal government to maintain a standing army, they expected States to maintain militias for defense. Why do you hate state’s rights?
Maybe under the Articles of Confederation that was so but the Constitution clearly requires the Federal government to provide for defense.What are you talking about? You never read his dissent, did you? He writes that the second amendment refers to a well regulated militia and that was its purpose. The founders never wanted the federal government to maintain a standing army, they expected States to maintain militias for defense. Why do you hate state’s rights?
You would know since that is all you do!I don’t think anyone could claim John Paul Stevens was ignorant or lying in his dissent in Heller, but good on you for sowing division in the country!
At a family barbecue down by the Mississippi River where I live some of the older kids were shooting off bottle rockets at the same time other kids were shooting rocks in the water with a slingshot. People across the river apparently saw some splashing in the water and assumed we were shooting guns across the river. Next thing I know a cop is walking up to the campfire wanting to talk to the owner (me). He saw it was just a family gathering with people there from 6 weeks old to 80. The first words out of his mouth were "Is anybody armed here?" The first words out of my mouth were "normally everybody is".Thursday around noon the local Police Chief and an officer paid me a visit. The Chief wanted to charge me with a crime but had no legal standing to do so. Last winter during duck hunting season there was an uproar over the sounds of the shotguns being fired because the ducks settled in a cove with high cliffs on either side that made every shot do a double echo. The people living on those cliffs did not understand, nor would listen that everything was being done legally ( nimby ). Many of those that complained about me thought I was doing the same thing ( shooting ducks ). Any how we reached a " deal" every time I intend to go target shooting I am to call the local police station in advance.
Just for you Rod, Peace brotherAt a family barbecue down by the Mississippi River where I live some of the older kids were shooting off bottle rockets at the same time other kids were shooting rocks in the water with a slingshot. People across the river apparently saw some splashing in the water and assumed we were shooting guns across the river. Next thing I know a cop is walking up to the campfire wanting to talk to the owner (me). He saw it was just a family gathering with people there from 6 weeks old to 80. The first words out of his mouth were "Is anybody armed here?" The first words out of my mouth were "normally everybody is".